Second Shifting theorem to find Laplace transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the second shifting theorem to determine the Laplace transform of the piecewise function defined as f(t) = 4 - t² for t < 2 and f(t) = 0 for t ≥ 2. The transformation is achieved by incorporating the Heaviside step function, resulting in the expression f(t) = (4 - t²)(1 - u(t - 2)). The second shifting theorem states that L(g(t-k)u(t-k)) = e^(-sk)G(s), which is crucial for understanding the transition from the original function to its transformed state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms
  • Familiarity with the second shifting theorem
  • Knowledge of the Heaviside step function, u(t-a)
  • Basic calculus, specifically piecewise functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Heaviside step function in depth
  • Learn how to apply the second shifting theorem in various contexts
  • Explore examples of piecewise functions and their Laplace transforms
  • Investigate the implications of Laplace transforms in control systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, mathematics, and physics who are working with Laplace transforms, particularly those focusing on control theory and differential equations.

helpinghand
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Can some one help me to understand this:

I need to use the second shifting theorem to get the Laplace transform, given:

f(t) = { 4 - t2 , t < 2 ...... 1
{ 0 , t >= 2


They got this:

f(t) = (4 - t2)(1 - u(t - 2)) .... 2


I know that the second shifting theroem says that L(g(t-k)u(t-k)) = e-skG(s)

But the thing is I don't know how they get from 1 to 2, can someone please explain this?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mark's notes leave a bit to be desired

you have to use the heaviside step function u(t-a)
I think of it as a function that can be switched on at any time t and remains on forever
knowing that the function equals zero for t<a and equals 1 for t>a.
We want the function to be equal to 4-t^2 for t less than 2. but u(t-2)=0 for t<2
so we must add the expression 4-t^2 for t<2, then take it away for t>2

hence:
f(t)=(4-t^2)-(4-t^2)u(t-2)

As far as i can see there is no "proper" way to do this, certainly not in the lecture notes anyway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K