Sectional Drawings: Understand & Draw Z to Z

  • Thread starter Thread starter drewzy29
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding and creating sectional views from a given top view and front view, specifically drawing the sectional view from cutting plane Z-Z. Participants clarify that the shaded area in the front view represents a chamfered plate, and emphasize that only visible features at the cutting plane should be included in the sectional drawing. Misinterpretations regarding the inclusion of chamfers and hidden lines are addressed, leading to actionable advice on simplifying the drawing for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sectional views in technical drawing
  • Familiarity with cutting planes and their representation
  • Knowledge of chamfered edges and their visibility in cross sections
  • Proficiency in interpreting top and front views of objects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for drawing sectional views in AutoCAD
  • Learn about the conventions for representing hidden lines in technical drawings
  • Explore best practices for visualizing and illustrating chamfered edges
  • Study examples of sectional views to understand common pitfalls
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, architecture, and design who need to master the creation and interpretation of sectional drawings in technical documentation.

drewzy29
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

Don't understand the attached file at all. It makes no sense.

It's sectional views. And I'm supposed to draw the sectional view from Z to Z in the bottom view drawing. Which all hidden lines from the top view are already drawn. What is expected of me from this?
 

Attachments

  • 20140626_132713.jpg
    20140626_132713.jpg
    26.3 KB · Views: 486
Physics news on Phys.org
drewzy29 said:
Hi guys,

Don't understand the attached file at all. It makes no sense.

It's sectional views. And I'm supposed to draw the sectional view from Z to Z in the bottom view drawing. Which all hidden lines from the top view are already drawn. What is expected of me from this?

You are given a top view and the front view. IDK where you are getting 'bottom view' from unless it's cut off in the image you posted.

You are supposed to draw the cross section of the object using the cutting plane Z-Z as shown in the top view. The shaded area in the front view represents a plate with four corners chamfered located as shown by the dashed lines in the top view.

In other words, if you were to saw clean thru the object along line Z-Z and pulled the pieces apart, what would you see, looking at the object where the saw cut was made?

Take your best shot, upload it, and we can discuss further.
 
Hey mate. I had a go. Do the sectional lines mean viewed from the RHS?
 

Attachments

  • 1403758937612.jpg
    1403758937612.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 471
SteamKing said:
You are given a top view and the front view. IDK where you are getting 'bottom view' from unless it's cut off in the image you posted.

You are supposed to draw the cross section of the object using the cutting plane Z-Z as shown in the top view. The shaded area in the front view represents a plate with four corners chamfered located as shown by the dashed lines in the top view.

In other words, if you were to saw clean thru the object along line Z-Z and pulled the pieces apart, what would you see, looking at the object where the saw cut was made?

Take your best shot, upload it, and we can discuss further.

Do you think this is right? Is there any other possible answer? Need to hand it in, in a few hours. Sorry for the urgency
 
drewzy29 said:
Do you think this is right? Is there any other possible answer? Need to hand it in, in a few hours. Sorry for the urgency

Your attempt looks good for the most part. However, for the vertical plate, are the chamfers really visible where Z-Z cuts thru the piece? Think about it.
 
SteamKing said:
Your attempt looks good for the most part. However, for the vertical plate, are the chamfers really visible where Z-Z cuts thru the piece? Think about it.

Ahh no, you are right. Would the solid lines simply need to be changed to dotted lines to represent the chamfers being behind the vertical plate?
 
I wouldn't do that, because the chamfers are located some distance from the Z-Z cutting plane. I think they should be removed entirely. In other words, the section view should show only what would be visible if the part were cut at the cutting plane. Showing anything else would just cause confusion.
 
SteamKing said:
I wouldn't do that, because the chamfers are located some distance from the Z-Z cutting plane. I think they should be removed entirely. In other words, the section view should show only what would be visible if the part were cut at the cutting plane. Showing anything else would just cause confusion.

Hey mate, that makes total sense. I'll rub out the lines and keep it easy. Thanks so much. Sorry to bust your balls, but have another one below that I'm unsure of. It looks easy but not sure how to show it, looks like a hole in the middle of it, which would be shown as two solid lines I think. I just think it's hard when its cut down the middle of the upright plate, it'd look the same in my opinion.
 

Attachments

  • 1403766506422.jpg
    1403766506422.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 465
It won't look exactly the same. Think about the circle representing the outer of the cylinder. It meets the web so there won't be a line at that point. 90 degrees of the circle will be "missing".

Edit: Actually a bit more than 90 degrees.
 
  • #10
CWatters said:
It won't look exactly the same. Think about the circle representing the outer of the cylinder. It meets the web so there won't be a line at that point. 90 degrees of the circle will be "missing".

Edit: Actually a bit more than 90 degrees.

From the top view that's all its showing though, it keeps going from the upright piece into the circle at 90 degrees (most likely) and meets the piece under the cylinder. That's what I understand from the dotted lines. I don't understand how else it can be drawn?

Edit: keep in mind the outter cylinder is already printed on the paper along with the bottom plate as a guideline. So I can't really rub it out lol, which is why I have a hard time getting it
 
  • #11
This is what I would expect the section to look like (I've not shown hidden lines)...

I note your comment about not being able to rub out lines they already provided. I can't explain some of them.
 

Attachments

  • Section.jpg
    Section.jpg
    8.6 KB · Views: 475
  • #12
CWatters said:
This is what I would expect the section to look like (I've not shown hidden lines)...

I note your comment about not being able to rub out lines they already provided. I can't explain some of them.

Hi CWatters, that makes perfect sense to me and is how I would have expected it to look. Not sure why they started us off wrong to begin with. Not a very useful sectional drawing to begin with unfortunately, doesn't give you any information that you couldn't already see.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K