B Seeing a half Moon - where is the Sun?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tayler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Sun The sun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of seeing a half moon while the sun is rising, with the sun behind the observer and the moon in front. Participants explain that for a full moon to be visible, the sun, moon, and Earth must be nearly aligned, which is not the case in this scenario. They suggest that atmospheric refraction could distort the appearance of the moon, making it seem different from its actual phase. Observers are encouraged to recreate the scenario using models to better understand the angles involved. The conversation highlights the complexities of human perception in relation to astronomical observations.
Tayler
Messages
35
Reaction score
7
A little off subject, but a few years ago I went out fishing just as the sun was rising. Perfect morning, not a cloud in the sky. The moon at this stage, was still clearly visible and both the moon and the entire sun were sharing the same sky. Which is pretty cool but what to this day makes me question reality is the fact that the sun was directly behind me and the moon was directly infront of me and yet I could only see half the moon. How does that happen?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Tayler said:
A little off subject, but a few years ago I went out fishing just as the sun was rising. Perfect morning, not a cloud in the sky. The moon at this stage, was still clearly visible and both the moon and the entire sun were sharing the same sky. Which is pretty cool but what to this day makes me question reality is the fact that the sun was directly behind me and the moon was directly infront of me and yet I could only see half the moon. How does that happen?
This is really off topic and perhaps my answer will be removed.

To see the full moon requires that moon, Earth and sun are almost on a straight line which happens to be at sunset. If the sun is just behind you that isn't sufficient, the angle between moon, you and sun wasn't close to 180°.
 
  • Like
Likes Tayler
timmdeeg said:
This is really off topic and perhaps my answer will be removed.

To see the full moon requires that moon, Earth and sun are almost on a straight line which happens to be at sunset. If the sun is just behind you that isn't sufficient, the angle between moon, you and sun wasn't close to 180°.
It sure looked close enough, and even if it wasn't bang on 180°, less the half the moon was showing?
 
I don't know. However, you mentioned fishing, so there was a big body of cool water and you also mentioned the sun rising, which means the air was being heated faster in some places.

So, there could be some refraction happening. Were you on the water? Was the moon also suffering some aberration due to refraction? Maybe the real alignment of the sun and moon wasn't as close to 180 degrees as it appeared.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes davenn and Tayler
This sounds impossible. You are in a line between the sun and the moon, and the sun is not in line with you and the moon. I don't think so.

Can you give us the date?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, sophiecentaur, russ_watters and 1 other person
Tayler said:
Which is pretty cool but what to this day makes me question reality is the fact that the sun was directly behind me and the moon was directly infront of me and yet I could only see half the moon. How does that happen?
I suspect that the Moon was still pretty far above the horizon and not a perfect half-moon. We humans are very poor at judging distances, angles, and other such things with any real precision.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, russ_watters and Tayler
Drakkith said:
I suspect that the Moon was still pretty far above the horizon and not a perfect half-moon. We humans are very poor at judging distances, angles, and other such things with any real precision.
Thats the only excuse I can think of. Must be the size and distance of the sun and moon from where I was viewing them that give me this sort of "illusion".
 
Vanadium 50 said:
This sounds impossible. You are in a line between the sun and the moon, and the sun is not in line with you and the moon. I don't think so.

Can you give us the date?
That would be very hard to remember an exact date but if I do a bit of thinking I could get pretty close. It looked fake. Like a glitch in the matrix 😂
Will Learn said:
I don't know. However, you mentioned fishing, so there was a big body of cool water and you also mentioned the sun rising, which means the air was being heated faster in some places.

So, there could be some refraction happening. Were you on the water? Was the moon also suffering some aberration due to refraction? Maybe the real alignment of the sun and moon wasn't as close to 180 degrees as it appeared.
Yeah, I was in the boat 3 kms out from the shore.

Do you mean like a change in colour? If so no. It just looked like it was fake. This is what actually made me so fascinated by space 😁
 
Tayler said:
A little off subject, but a few years ago I went out fishing just as the sun was rising. Perfect morning, not a cloud in the sky. The moon at this stage, was still clearly visible and both the moon and the entire sun were sharing the same sky. Which is pretty cool but what to this day makes me question reality is the fact that the sun was directly behind me and the moon was directly infront of me and yet I could only see half the moon. How does that happen?
You should try to re-create this scene with two pieces of fruit and a flashlight.

The simple explanation is that the sun and moon were both higher than you think.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
russ_watters said:
You should try to re-create this scene with two pieces of fruit and a flashlight.

The simple explanation is that the sun and moon were both higher than you think.
Yeah I did that and it lights up the whole face of the object, indicating I should have seen a full moon? Maybe if I try again, but to more precise scale.
 
  • #11
Tayler said:
..Concerning refraction...Do you mean like a change in colour?
Not quite. I meant that light rays are bent when they pass from a region of low density to a region of high density.

1621757222230.png


Taken from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refraction

Hence, different air densities could make the sun and moon appear lower than they actually were.
There are many visual distortions that are common with atmospheric refraction, for example the sun is often said to look flatter. Various things could have worked together to create something that "looked fake", as you described.

Soldiers chase after Oasis that they see of the middle in the desert, although it is usually just a refracted image of the blue sky that they are seeing on the ground.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes davenn and Tayler
  • #12
Will Learn said:
Not quite. I meant that light rays are bent when they pass from a region of low density to a region of high density.

View attachment 283403

Thanks for helping me understand. I can see what you mean and that could be a factor.
 
  • #13
Refraction is another matter but, if you want to be sure that the Sun, Moon and you are in a straight line, the Moon should coincide with the shadow of your head (eye). If your shadow is not pretty close to the Moon then you weren't seeing a half moon. Contrast could be very poor in the daytime too.
1621763523251.png
1621763542295.png

Those two images are seven days apart so the accuracy with which you could assess how near the left hand (half Moon) condition will be limited. Just one day out could mean 12 degree error, or so.
Navigators of old had to learn to get the best out of their observations. With a one-off observation, you are really working with a disadvantage.
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith and Tayler
  • #14
Notes_210523_203427.jpg
Notes_210523_203427.jpg
 
  • #15
Notice that the dark side of the moon shouldn't be dark.

Sorry about my artwork haha
 
  • #16
Tayler said:
Notice that the dark side of the moon shouldn't be dark.

Sorry about my artwork haha

Perhaps your shadow should be to your left? Memory can play tricks. (Artwork, definitely a C-, I'm afraid. :wink:) Both you and the Moon should be illuminated from the same side. I think it should be the apparent height of the shadow of your head that should be the same as the Moon's elevation. Both Sun and Moon should be low in the sky. Details of atmospheric refraction are only worth following up when you have sorted the basics.
I like @russ_watters suggestion of trying a model with a flashlight and a basket ball - a good, directional light, in a dark room.
Any time you can go out and see the Moon, you can rely on the Sun being in a line, just above the centre of the illuminated bit of the Moon. If there's a lot of Moon illuminated then the Sun will be below the horizon but what you see makes sense. In the mid evening, the Sun will be a bit further North of where it set and the Moon's appearance will verify that - get your ball and flashlight outside and do the two things in parallel. (Ignore strange comments from passers by!)
One other thing you can do is to look at the Moon when it is at 'half moon' stage (look at a lunar calendar on line). At around 1800 local time, it should be at its highest in the sky. The Sun may or may not be visible, depending on the time of year.
 
  • #17
Maybe I've just spent to much time overthinking it 😅🤷‍♂️ but yes ill definitely have a play around with some balls 😂 I am sure that won't look strange haha
 
  • #18
Tayler said:
Maybe I've just spent to much time overthinking it 😅🤷‍♂️ but yes ill definitely have a play around with some balls 😂 I am sure that won't look strange haha
You'll need to have a story ready!
 
  • Like
Likes Tayler
  • #19
russ_watters said:
The simple explanation is that the sun and moon were both higher than you think.
I guarantee you this is the case. Astronomical bodies are wrong a lot less than the human brain is.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Tayler, russ_watters and 1 other person
  • #20
So I've just done a bit of digging and there is this thing called the terminator illusion. Maybe this could be a factor?
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top