Selection rules beyond the central field approximation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving electric dipole selection rules for multi-electron atoms, emphasizing the limitations of the central field approximation typically used for hydrogen. It highlights the importance of considering residual electron interactions before applying electric field effects, as these interactions often have greater energy magnitudes. A key point made is that the relative strength of residual coupling compared to spin-orbit coupling is crucial for understanding selection rules. A recommended reference for further reading is "Atomic Physics" by OUP. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexity of selection rules in multi-electron systems beyond simple models.
znbhckcs
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm trying to figure out how to get the electric dipole selection rules for an atom with many electrons. In all textbooks that I've seen it's shown for Hydrogen, or in the central field approximation (which is, in some sense, equivalent to Hydrogen).

Obviously the central field approximation is necessary, but after you apply it, shouldn't you first take the residual interactions between the electrons into account before thinking about the electric field?
I mean, the energies of interactions are much larger (normally) than the magnitude of the field.

It would be great if you could mention some reference where I can read about this stuff.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose, the only strict selection rules which apply to the general case are those for total angular momentum J.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K