Selection Rules for EM Dipole Radiation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the selection rules for electromagnetic (EM) dipole radiation, specifically focusing on the conditions under which electrons transition between bound states. Key points include the necessity for parity change and the conservation of angular momentum, with photons possessing a spin of 1, leading to j=1 for the dipole transitions. The matrix element for dipole moment transitions is defined using the integral of the wave functions, emphasizing that transitions are only allowed under specific conditions related to the spherical harmonics and angular momentum conservation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and atomic transitions
  • Familiarity with Fermi's Golden Rule
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and their properties
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Fermi's Golden Rule in detail to understand transition probabilities
  • Learn about spherical harmonics and their role in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the derivation of matrix elements for dipole transitions
  • Investigate the implications of angular momentum conservation in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on atomic physics, dipole radiation, and the mathematical foundations of quantum transitions.

Dumbleboar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hey,
I was asking myself a few questions about the selection rules for EM dipole radiation which occurs if electrons "jump" into lower bound states according to the selection rules.

now I know that the full explanation about matrix elements of the dipole operator comes from fermi's golden rule... which I will learn next semester... but apart from that...we have 2 considerations:

1) Parity... parity has to change... ok i got this
2) Conservation of angular momentum:
we have
ji=j\gamma + jf
and we assume that
j\gamma=1

WHY is this angular momentum 1??
I guess it has something to do that the cartesian components of the Dipole operator are proportional to linear compinations of the spherical harmonics Y1,m but I don't get this point at all...

I'd highly appreciate your help!
thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok Photons have Spin 1... therefore they have j=1

but i guess you can also explain it through expanding the dipole radiation into sperical harmonics and that only those with l=1 can express a dipole or something... could that be it?
 
Dumbleboar said:
but i guess you can also explain it through expanding the dipole radiation into sperical harmonics and that only those with l=1 can express a dipole or something... could that be it?

Yes, that's correct. I'll skip the derivation and just state that the matrix element for the dipole moment transition is:
\mathbf{r}_{n',n} = \int u_{n'}^*\sum_i\mathbf{r}_i u_n d\tau
I.e. zero unless you have a mean change in location along some axis. (which is intuitive, right?)

Using the rationale from Bethe and Salpeter, the single-electron atom wave-function is:
u_{nlm} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}R_{nl}(r)P_{lm}(\vartheta)e^{im\phi}

So using z = r\cos \vartheta, the matrix element for the transition on the z axis is:
z_{nlm}^{n'l'm'} = \int u^*_{n'l'm'}z u_{nlm} d\tau = \int_0^\infty r^2 R_{n'l'}(r)R_{nl}(r) dr * \int_0^\pi P_{l'm'}(\vartheta)P_{lm}(\vartheta)\cos (\vartheta)\sin (\vartheta) d\vartheta * \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{i(m-m')\phi} d\phi

The last integral will be zero unless m = m', in which case it's exactly 1, so \Delta m = 0, and the second integral will vanish unless \Delta l = \pm 1 (a bit trickier, turn the legendre functions into the related spherical harmonics, one of which becomes l \rightarrow l \pm 1. Then you have from the othogonality relations of spherical harmonics that the integral will be zero unless l = l' \pm 1)

And you can of course do the same for any other coordinate and arrive at the same rules.
 
Last edited:
The \theta equation can be integrated using the following recursion relation

(2l+1)cos(\theta)P_{l,m}(cos(\theta)) = (l-m+1)P_{l+1,m}(cos(\theta))+(l+m)P_{l-1,m}(cos(\theta))

which shows that \Delta l = \pm 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K