Self-Learning QM: Is It Difficult?

  • Context: Quantum 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Self-learning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of self-learning quantum mechanics (QM) through various textbooks. Participants explore the difficulties encountered in understanding the material and the adequacy of the recommended resources for independent study.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with understanding QM textbooks, noting that while some concepts are grasped, others remain unclear.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of asking specific questions to identify unclear areas in the learning process.
  • Several participants suggest alternative resources, including the Susskind book and lectures, as potentially clearer options for self-learners.
  • Concerns are raised about the prerequisites for studying QM, with a participant questioning their own mathematical and physics background.
  • There is acknowledgment that self-learning can be challenging, but encouragement is offered to persist in the study.
  • One participant highlights the importance of timing in learning complex subjects, suggesting that foundational knowledge should be solidified before advancing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that self-learning QM can be difficult and that persistence is important. However, there is no consensus on the adequacy of specific textbooks or the prerequisites necessary for effective self-study.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various textbooks and resources without resolving which are most effective for self-learning. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific areas where participants struggle, which affects the clarity of the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in self-learning quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking advice on resources and strategies for overcoming challenges in understanding complex topics.

kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
(Sorry for my bad English.) I've been reading severous QM textbooks that people say are good to learn QM: Sakurai, Shankar, Thankappan. I start reading and understand things in principle, but then I don't get anymore. The only book I think really helped me was QM by McIntyre but it goes not deep in the subject. So is it hard for one person self learn QM, are those books not good enough for self-learning or am I retarded? :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We (the knowledgeable members, that is) are here not to judge the intellectual/comprehension abilities of people, we are here to provide alternative and hopefully clearer (where these exist) explanations to things people put down in textbooks. You say: „I start reading and understand things in principle, but then I don't get anymore”. This is vague, we cannot know which part from which book is left unclear to you. Is it the math, is it the wording, perhaps one author really makes a mistake (A doesn't follow from B, while the author says A follows from B), we don't know and couldn't know without your input. It is not the end of the world if you want to learn something by yourself, just make sure you ask the answerable questions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, QuantumQuest and smodak
I agree with dextercioby. Also try the susskid book and the susskind lectures
 
kent davidge said:
(Sorry for my bad English.) I've been reading severous QM textbooks that people say are good to learn QM: Sakurai, Shankar, Thankappan. I start reading and understand things in principle, but then I don't get anymore. The only book I think really helped me was QM by McIntyre but it goes not deep in the subject. So is it hard for one person self learn QM, are those books not good enough for self-learning or am I retarded? :cry:

Yes, it can be very hard to self-learn anything. So don't feel bad. Persist and it will come naturally.

What is your math and physics knowledge? Are you sure you meet the prereqs for QM?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and QuantumQuest
micromass said:
Yes, it can be very hard to self-learn anything. So don't feel bad. Persist and it will come naturally.

What is your math and physics knowledge? Are you sure you meet the prereqs for QM?
I study physics at university. Here in my country it's commom to learn mathematics at first, then this year I'm getting calculus and linear algebra classes. But because I like physics so much, I started studying that topics about 1 year ago. So what I know from mathematics is all basic calculus and linear algebra and from physics I know the basics of all subjects. But I'd like to learn deeper about general relativity, quantum mechanics etc.
 
Where are you getting stuck?
 
kent davidge said:
So what I know from mathematics is all basic calculus and linear algebra and from physics I know the basics of all subjects. But I'd like to learn deeper about general relativity, quantum mechanics etc.

Admirable ambition but I also want also underline a (famous) quote

'' All things at its time ''

Ssnow
 
atyy said:
Where are you getting stuck?
Ssnow said:
Admirable ambition but I also want also underline a (famous) quote

'' All things at its time ''

Ssnow
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K