Semi-infinite + finite potential well QM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyuubi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the wave function behavior in a semi-infinite potential well, emphasizing that the wave function must be zero at the infinite barrier at x=0 to maintain continuity. It suggests that the solution can be derived from the odd solution of a centered finite well, but highlights the need to recalculate the energies of bound states due to the hybrid nature of the problem. The importance of matching boundary conditions at x=0 and x=a is stressed, along with the necessity of normalization. The conversation concludes that while the odd solution serves as a sketch, a formal solution involving constants and boundary conditions is essential for accurate results. This approach will clarify the distinction between bound and scattering states in the energy spectrum.
Kyuubi
Messages
18
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m is subject to the potential given below (relevant equations) with V0 > 0.
Relevant Equations
\begin{align*}
V(x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}\infty& x < 0\\-V_0&0<x<a\\0&x>a\end{array}} \right.,\\
\end{align*}
I want to verify some inspection I'm making at this problem. Because of the infinite barrier at ##x=0##, we expect the wave function to take the value 0 there to preserve continuity. As such, we can make the conclusion that the wave function will just be a sine term in the [0,a] region.

But looking at the discussion of the finite well in Griffiths' QM, we are basically just taking the odd solution of the finite well, and instead of analyzing the ##x>0## half and saying that the ##x<0## region is replicated with ##-\psi(-x)##, we are just saying that the left half is 0. This is also taking into consideration the fact that the even part of the solution is also not included.

So the solution to this problem should simply just be the odd solution of the centered finite well.
Is this a correct assessment?

Note: I am only interested in the bound states here as of now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyuubi said:
So the solution to this problem should simply just be the odd solution of the centered finite well.
Is this a correct assessment?
I am concerned about the meaning of "just be the odd solution". As far as sketching the wavefunction, yes. But you would have to recalculate the energies of the bound states. This situation is a hybrid of the infinite potential well and a square well with bound states. I would solve the problem formally by writing the solutions in terms of constants to be determined by matching boundary conditions etc. instead of "just writing the odd solution." Don't forget to normalize in the end.
 
I'd just solve the boundary problem. You have ##\psi(x)=0## for ##x<0##, which means that you need the boundary condition ##\psi(0)=0##. Further at ##x=a## both ##\psi## and ##\psi'## should be continuous. Then for the possible energy eigenvalues you can solve for ##-V_0 \leq E \leq 0## and for ##E>0##, separately. It should be clear then, which of these values refer to bound states ("discrete" energy eigenspectrum) and scattering states ("continuous" energy spectrum).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top