Semi-infinite + finite potential well QM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyuubi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of wave functions in a semi-infinite potential well, specifically focusing on the odd solution of a centered finite potential well as described in Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics. The wave function must equal zero at the infinite barrier (x=0) to maintain continuity, leading to the conclusion that the wave function in the region [0,a] is represented by a sine term. The participants emphasize the necessity of recalculating the energies of the bound states rather than merely adopting the odd solution, highlighting the importance of matching boundary conditions and normalizing the wave function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions and boundary conditions.
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics, specifically the sections on finite and infinite potential wells.
  • Knowledge of energy eigenvalues and their significance in quantum systems.
  • Experience with normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave functions in finite potential wells using Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics.
  • Learn about boundary condition matching techniques in quantum mechanics problems.
  • Investigate the calculation of energy eigenvalues for bound states in potential wells.
  • Review normalization methods for wave functions in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying potential wells, wave functions, and energy eigenvalues. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of bound states in quantum systems.

Kyuubi
Messages
18
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m is subject to the potential given below (relevant equations) with V0 > 0.
Relevant Equations
\begin{align*}
V(x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}\infty& x < 0\\-V_0&0<x<a\\0&x>a\end{array}} \right.,\\
\end{align*}
I want to verify some inspection I'm making at this problem. Because of the infinite barrier at ##x=0##, we expect the wave function to take the value 0 there to preserve continuity. As such, we can make the conclusion that the wave function will just be a sine term in the [0,a] region.

But looking at the discussion of the finite well in Griffiths' QM, we are basically just taking the odd solution of the finite well, and instead of analyzing the ##x>0## half and saying that the ##x<0## region is replicated with ##-\psi(-x)##, we are just saying that the left half is 0. This is also taking into consideration the fact that the even part of the solution is also not included.

So the solution to this problem should simply just be the odd solution of the centered finite well.
Is this a correct assessment?

Note: I am only interested in the bound states here as of now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyuubi said:
So the solution to this problem should simply just be the odd solution of the centered finite well.
Is this a correct assessment?
I am concerned about the meaning of "just be the odd solution". As far as sketching the wavefunction, yes. But you would have to recalculate the energies of the bound states. This situation is a hybrid of the infinite potential well and a square well with bound states. I would solve the problem formally by writing the solutions in terms of constants to be determined by matching boundary conditions etc. instead of "just writing the odd solution." Don't forget to normalize in the end.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kyuubi
I'd just solve the boundary problem. You have ##\psi(x)=0## for ##x<0##, which means that you need the boundary condition ##\psi(0)=0##. Further at ##x=a## both ##\psi## and ##\psi'## should be continuous. Then for the possible energy eigenvalues you can solve for ##-V_0 \leq E \leq 0## and for ##E>0##, separately. It should be clear then, which of these values refer to bound states ("discrete" energy eigenspectrum) and scattering states ("continuous" energy spectrum).
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K