Semi-infinite + finite potential well QM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kyuubi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the wave function behavior in a semi-infinite potential well, emphasizing that the wave function must be zero at the infinite barrier at x=0 to maintain continuity. It suggests that the solution can be derived from the odd solution of a centered finite well, but highlights the need to recalculate the energies of bound states due to the hybrid nature of the problem. The importance of matching boundary conditions at x=0 and x=a is stressed, along with the necessity of normalization. The conversation concludes that while the odd solution serves as a sketch, a formal solution involving constants and boundary conditions is essential for accurate results. This approach will clarify the distinction between bound and scattering states in the energy spectrum.
Kyuubi
Messages
18
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m is subject to the potential given below (relevant equations) with V0 > 0.
Relevant Equations
\begin{align*}
V(x) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}\infty& x < 0\\-V_0&0<x<a\\0&x>a\end{array}} \right.,\\
\end{align*}
I want to verify some inspection I'm making at this problem. Because of the infinite barrier at ##x=0##, we expect the wave function to take the value 0 there to preserve continuity. As such, we can make the conclusion that the wave function will just be a sine term in the [0,a] region.

But looking at the discussion of the finite well in Griffiths' QM, we are basically just taking the odd solution of the finite well, and instead of analyzing the ##x>0## half and saying that the ##x<0## region is replicated with ##-\psi(-x)##, we are just saying that the left half is 0. This is also taking into consideration the fact that the even part of the solution is also not included.

So the solution to this problem should simply just be the odd solution of the centered finite well.
Is this a correct assessment?

Note: I am only interested in the bound states here as of now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyuubi said:
So the solution to this problem should simply just be the odd solution of the centered finite well.
Is this a correct assessment?
I am concerned about the meaning of "just be the odd solution". As far as sketching the wavefunction, yes. But you would have to recalculate the energies of the bound states. This situation is a hybrid of the infinite potential well and a square well with bound states. I would solve the problem formally by writing the solutions in terms of constants to be determined by matching boundary conditions etc. instead of "just writing the odd solution." Don't forget to normalize in the end.
 
I'd just solve the boundary problem. You have ##\psi(x)=0## for ##x<0##, which means that you need the boundary condition ##\psi(0)=0##. Further at ##x=a## both ##\psi## and ##\psi'## should be continuous. Then for the possible energy eigenvalues you can solve for ##-V_0 \leq E \leq 0## and for ##E>0##, separately. It should be clear then, which of these values refer to bound states ("discrete" energy eigenspectrum) and scattering states ("continuous" energy spectrum).
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K