Separate Section For Professionals

  • Thread starter Thread starter RogueOne
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
There is concern about the lack of a dedicated section for industry professionals on the website, as the Automotive section is perceived to be filled with pseudoscience and unqualified opinions. Many users express frustration over the prevalence of unfounded theories that undermine credible discussions. The difficulty in verifying credentials on an anonymous forum raises questions about how to maintain a professional environment. Users are encouraged to report problematic posts to help moderators identify and address these issues. Ultimately, joining a professional society may be a more effective way to engage with qualified peers.
RogueOne
Messages
130
Reaction score
57
Is there a separate section on this website for those of us in the industry and/or with differing levels of proficiency? The Automotive section is infested with many pseudo scientists (who annoyingly believe themselves to be experts) with very little knowledge or willingness to learn. As of now, the section is dominated by unfounded theories with no basis in reality or the scientific method. Half of them are hoaxes that everybody in the respective industry is fed up with. I'd like to see some real science.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's pretty much impossible to do upfront qualification/credentials checks on an anonymous Internet forum, so it's not clear how we would keep the unqualified unprofessionals out of a section intended for qualified professionals. However, hoaxes and crackpot theories not accepted by competent professionals are out-of-bounds here no matter which section they're posted in... So use that "report" button freely when you see something that doesn't belong.
 
  • Like
Likes RogueOne
Nugatory said:
However, hoaxes and crackpot theories not accepted by competent professionals are out-of-bounds here no matter which section they're posted in... So use that "report" button freely when you see something that doesn't belong.

I'd like to reiterate this part of Nugatory's post. Please use the report feature to report any posts which you believe to be problematic. There's no other way for us mentors to find these posts unless we stumble across them by accident.
 
  • Like
Likes RogueOne
RogueOne said:
Is there a separate section on this website for those of us in the industry and/or with differing levels of proficiency?

I would expect that the best way to do that is to join a professional society and to use the forums run by that society and open only to members.
 
  • Like
Likes RogueOne
RogueOne said:
As of now, the section is dominated by unfounded theories with no basis in reality or the scientific method.
I'm not seeing this, so as mentioned already, use the Report link on the problematic posts, or send me a PM.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Back
Top