Separating capacitor plates: (+) or (-) work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a parallel-plate capacitor, specifically focusing on the force experienced by the plates as a function of the potential drop across the capacitor. Participants explore the relationship between force, energy, and work in the context of changing plate separation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the hint regarding the relationship between force and potential energy, questioning the meaning of the negative sign in the force equation. They also explore the concept of work being positive or negative in the context of electric charge and the forces acting on the capacitor plates.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships involved, with some participants clarifying their understanding of the force derived from potential energy. Guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of the negative sign in the context of work done against the attractive force between the plates.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion regarding the application of the hint and the definitions of work in this context. There is a focus on understanding the derivation of the force equation and its relation to energy changes without moving the plates.

Blehs
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a parallel-plate capacitor with plates of area A and with separation d. Find F(V), the magnitude of the force each plate experiences due to the other plate as a function of V, the potential drop across the capacitor.

Hint i used
If the plate separation were changed while the voltage was kept constant, the stored energy would change. The force between the plates would be the quantitiy that would be multiplied by the change in the plate separation to obtain the change in energy. In other words,

F= -dU/dd

Im not sure if I am fully understanding this hint. Is the formula they've provided simply Work = force x distance? Besides I am not actually supposed to move the plates, so what would i have to input for the the dd (change in distance) part?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



U = (ϵ0AV2)/(2d)

The formula they told me to work out for energy stored in a capacitor.

So I am also feeling quite confused about whether work should be positive or negative.

Because the two plates are oppositely charged, it means that they experience a force of attraction - therefore moving the plates further apart should mean positive work being done right?
However in the hint for this question I am working on, the work is deemed to be negative.

From my experiences with work being done, I've always felt that doing positive work means that some external force has to act upon the object to cause that particular change in position. Therefore for negative work, it is like releasing an object and letting it move by itself without you having to put any extra effort in.

If there is any easy way that people can determine whether work is positive or negative in the context of electric charge then please do tell.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Blehs said:
Hint i used
If the plate separation were changed while the voltage was kept constant, the stored energy would change. The force between the plates would be the quantitiy that would be multiplied by the change in the plate separation to obtain the change in energy. In other words,

F= -dU/dd

Im not sure if I am fully understanding this hint. Is the formula they've provided simply Work = force x distance? Besides I am not actually supposed to move the plates, so what would i have to input for the the dd (change in distance) part?
Are you given the potential energy function and then asked to find the force? That hint tells you how to find the force from the potential energy function--you're finding the derivative of U with respect to the distance.

So I am also feeling quite confused about whether work should be positive or negative.

Because the two plates are oppositely charged, it means that they experience a force of attraction - therefore moving the plates further apart should mean positive work being done right?
Right.
However in the hint for this question I am working on, the work is deemed to be negative.
Where does the hint say anything about work being positive?
 
Doc Al said:
Are you given the potential energy function and then asked to find the force? That hint tells you how to find the force from the potential energy function--you're finding the derivative of U with respect to the distance.

No i had to work out the function for U myself. It was an earlier part of the hint so i just chucked the equation in.

Doc Al said:
Where does the hint say anything about work being positive?

Ok well starting from the equation F = -dU/dd, i thought that in general, dU would mean change in energy (like u2-u1) and dd means change in distance (d2-d1). Therefore the equation would become U2-U1 = - Force x (d2-d1) which is similar to the work = force x distance equation.

Therefore i thought that the F = -dU/dd equation had somehow been derived from the concept of work being done. That then caused me to ponder why the negative sign was in there.
 
Yes, that equation is related to the work being done. The negative sign is because you need to apply a force opposite to the force of attraction to calculate the work done. F is the force between the plates, so -F is the force you must exert.

Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pegrav.html#pen"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ohhh ok, that makes sense and is simple too - i just thought too much and confused myself i think.

Ok so back to the actual question where I am supposed to find F(V). I differentiated U with respect to d and i got

dU/dd = (-ϵ0AV2/2) x loged

so does F(V) = dU/dd?
 
Blehs said:
Ok so back to the actual question where I am supposed to find F(V). I differentiated U with respect to d and i got

dU/dd = (-ϵ0AV2/2) x loged
What's the derivative of 1/x with respect to x?

so does F(V) = dU/dd?
Don't forget the minus sign.
 
woops yeah i was thinking of integration.

instead of loged its supposed to be -1/d2

so the two minus signs cancel each other out
Got it correct! thnx heaps for clearing things up a little =]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K