Separation of variables - Laplace's Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving Laplace's equation using the separation of variables technique, specifically under the boundary conditions u(x,0)=0, u(x,1)=0, u(0,y)=0, and u(2,y)=asin(2πy). The user successfully separates the variables into two ordinary differential equations (ODEs): F''(x) - λF(x) = 0 and G''(y) + λG(y) = 0. The analysis reveals that for λ=0 and λ<0, no solutions satisfy the boundary conditions, while for λ>0, the solutions involve trigonometric functions for G(y). The user struggles with applying the boundary conditions effectively to derive the constants A, B, C, D, and sigma.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation and its boundary conditions.
  • Familiarity with the separation of variables technique in partial differential equations.
  • Knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and their solutions.
  • Basic concepts of hyperbolic and trigonometric functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in greater depth, focusing on Laplace's equation.
  • Learn how to apply boundary conditions to determine constants in solutions of ODEs.
  • Explore the implications of different values of the separation constant λ on the solutions.
  • Review examples of solving Laplace's equation with various boundary conditions for practical understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying partial differential equations, as well as researchers and professionals working on mathematical modeling involving Laplace's equation.

hermish
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Use separation of variables to find the solution to Laplaces equation satisfying the boundary conditions

u(x,0)=0 (0<x<2)
u(x,1)=0 (0<x<2)
u(0,y)=0 (0<y<1)
u(2,y)= asin2πy(0<y<1)


The Attempt at a Solution



I am able to perform the separation of variables technique on the wave equation. The heat equation is a little harder, I struggle a bit, but eventually I get there. Laplace's equation is pretty much impossible. From my understanding, the method is very similar in all three cases, but I think there are some differences which I don't see, which is why I can't do this question.

So I managed to separate the variables, deriving two ODE's, one in terms of x and one in terms of y, with the separation constant λ.

F''(x) - λF(x) = 0
G''(x) - λG(x) = 0

For the case where λ=0, there are no solutions because nothing can satisfy the last boundary condition listed.

For the case where λ<0, I think there are no solutions, I could sort of tell by having a look at the final answer given. I don't understand how to show this?

For the case where λ>0
I get F(x) = A*cosh(sigma*x) + B*sinh(sigma*y)
G(y) = (Ccos(sigma*y) + Dsin(sigma*y))

where sigma is the roots of the ODE's.

so now u(x,t) = F(x)*G(y)
I have this function with 5 unknowns, A,B,C,D, and sigma
When I apply all the boundary conditions, I don't really get anywhere. No helpful information appears.

What am I doing wrong? Or, what am I not doing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a sign error in one of your ODEs. Also, one of them should have ys in it. It looks like what you meant to write was:
\begin{align*}
F''(x) - \lambda F(x) &= 0 \\
G''(y) + \lambda G(y) &= 0
\end{align*} Depending on the sign of ##\lambda##, you get regular trig functions for one solution and hyperbolic functions for the other.

To see why you can't have ##\lambda<0##, try to satisfy the boundary conditions when you have ##G(y) = C\sinh \sigma y + D\cosh \sigma y##. To satisfy the first two boundary conditions, you need G(0)=0 and G(1)=0. You should find the only way you can do this is if C=D=0, which isn't a useful solution.

If ##\lambda>0##, you have ##G(y) = C\sin \sigma y + D\cos \sigma y##. What do you get from the first two boundary conditions in this case?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K