Series convergence for certain values of p

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of a series defined by the expression \(\sum_{n=|p|}^{∞}{2^{pn} (n+p)! \over(n+p)^n}\), where participants are exploring which integer values of \(p\) lead to convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the generalized ratio test but encounters uncertainty in the next steps after simplifying the limit expression. Some participants question the correctness of the denominator and the implications of \(p \leq 0\) on the first term of the series. Others suggest showing the steps leading to the ratio and discuss potential issues with cancellations made during simplification.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance without revealing complete solutions. There is a recognition of the need to take limits as \(n\) approaches infinity, and some participants are exploring the use of Stirling's approximation as a potential tool for analysis. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that if \(p \leq 0\), the first term in the summation becomes problematic, raising questions about the validity of the series under certain conditions. There is also mention of homework rules that discourage providing direct answers, emphasizing the learning process.

yamborghini
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For which integer values of p does the following series converge:

[itex]\sum_{n=|p|}^{∞}{2^{pn} (n+p)! \over(n+p)^n}[/itex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to apply the generalised ratio test but get down to this stage where I'm not sure what to do next.

I have [itex]\lim{2^p(n+p)^n \over(n+1+p)}[/itex] so far from attempting to do the generalised ratio test.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Yambo, and welcome to PF.

Could you check your denominator ?

[edit] And: if p≤0, what is the first term in the summation ?
 
Last edited:
Hi BvU,

I've checked it. Got the sheet in front of me and it is definitely that.

(unless you mean I have something wrong in my attempt. )
 
Well, could you show the steps that lead to that ratio?
I do get something else in the denominator.
 
I shall omit the modulus signs and the lim in the equations.
[itex] 2^{p(n+1)}((n+1)+p)!\over((n+1)+p)^{(n+1)} [/itex]
multiplied by
[itex] (n+p)^n\over 2^{pn}(n+p)![/itex]

[itex] 2^{pn}2^{p}(n+1+p)(n+p)!(n+p)^n \over (n+1+p)^n(n+1+p)2^{pn}(n+p)![/itex]

then cancelling gives me

[itex] <br /> 2^{p}(n+p)^n \over (n+1+p)^n[/itex]

Is there something wrong with my cancellation?

edit* Oh I realized I forgot a ^n in my denominator. oops. I did have it down on paper though. not sure how to go from this stage.
 
Last edited:
Good thing you found that. Big difference.

Now we have to take the limit for n to ##\infty## and see what comes out. Not trivial, but not impossible either. 'Not sure' and 'don't know what to do' aren't good enough according to PF rules. Just giving you the next step would nullify the learning experience :smile:. So: What do you have in your toolbox to deal with this kind of limits ?

Coming back to the modulus sign: see post #2.
 
Well considering I've been doing this problem for 2 days I think I'm missing something from my tool box. Could you give me a clue? The furthest I've gotten is to factor the 2^p out and then simply put everything in brackets to the power of n. I'm not even sure if this is the right way to go because it leads to a dead end still, unless you can use standard limit 2 and say everything in the brackets is equal to r... but I have a very strong feeling you can't do that.

As for the first term, if n=0, we get p!
 
Last edited:
Putting everything in brackets to the power of n is a good idea... You have a fraction inside the brackets.

Use the identity [tex]\frac{a+b}{a+b+1}=\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{a+b}}[/tex]

ehild
 
yamborghini said:
Well considering I've been doing this problem for 2 days I think I'm missing something from my tool box. Could you give me a clue? The furthest I've gotten is to factor the 2^p out and then simply put everything in brackets to the power of n. I'm not even sure if this is the right way to go because it leads to a dead end still, unless you can use standard limit 2 and say everything in the brackets is equal to r... but I have a very strong feeling you can't do that.

I would recommend using Stirling's approximation: [tex] (n + p)! \sim \sqrt{2\pi(n + p)}\left(\frac{n + p}{e}\right)^{n+p}[/tex]

As for the first term, if n=0, we get p!

The first term is not [itex]n = 0[/itex]; the first term is [itex]n = |p|[/itex]. If [itex]p \leq 0[/itex] and [itex]n = |p|[/itex], then [itex]n = -p[/itex] and [itex](n + p) = (-p + p) = 0[/itex]. This is a problem.
 
  • #10
PA helps you with the modulus thing. I don't know why one should want to bring back in the factorials, but I haven't checked that out.

I figured you might end up studying something in the direction of ##\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\, \left(1+{x \over n}\right )^n ##. Now there's a hint !

Kudos for your persistence!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K