Series solution up to a term, power series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a series solution to the initial value problem defined by the differential equation (1-x)y,,+xy,-2y=0, specifically up to the term with x^6.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the form of the solution as a power series and the implications of substituting terms in the recurrence relation. Questions arise about how to express coefficients in terms of others to derive a_n+2.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring the relationships between coefficients in the series expansion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of terms, though there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for initial conditions due to the nature of the second-order differential equation, which may influence the series solution.

dp182
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


consider the initial value problem (1-x)y,,+xy,-2y=0 find the series solution up to the term with x6


Homework Equations


(1-x)y,,+xy,-2y=0


The Attempt at a Solution


assuming the answer has the form [itex]\Sigma[/itex]anxn
that gives y,,=[itex]\Sigma[/itex]nanxn-1 and y,,=[itex]\Sigma[/itex]n(n-1)anxn-2 then plugging these back in and getting rid of the xn-2 and xn-1 you get the equation [itex]\Sigma[/itex](n+2)(n+1)an+2xn-[itex]\Sigma[/itex]n(n+1)an+1xn+[itex]\Sigma[/itex]nanxn-2[itex]\Sigma[/itex]anxn so what I'm wondering is how do you replace the an+1 with an an so you can solve for an+2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi dp182! :smile:
dp182 said:
… how do you replace the an+1 with an an so you can solve for an+2

just subtract 1 from everything :wink:

(eg ∑an+1xn = ∑anxn-1)
 
dp182 said:
how do you replace the an+1 with an an so you can solve for an+2
You don't. The recurrence relation involves an, an+1, and an+2. There's nothing wrong with that.
 
It makes sense that the recurrence relation for a_n+2 involves a_n+1 and a_n. It would require you to define a_0 and a_1 and Second order differential equations require two boundary/initial conditions for a solution.
 
So If I solve for an+2 I get an+2=n(n+1)an+1+an(2-n)/(n+2)(n+1) so to get my terms up to x6 I will just input values of n, so my series will be in terms of a0and a1?
 
Yup, but you made an algebra error solving for an+2 (or omitted very needed parentheses).
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K