MHB Set Planck's constant equal to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacobi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Set
jacobi1
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I have an interesting 'What If' question. I understand that it was originally meant to be in jest, but I am interested to know what would happen. Here is the original joke: "There was a discussion in the math and physics departments of a university. It was about whether to allow calculators on the exams. After heated debate, the physics department decided in favor of allowing calculators because their 3 hour exam had one question: 'Describe the universe, if Planck's constant were equal to 1.'"
If Planck's constant, instead of being $$6.63 \times 10^{-34}$$ J s, were 1 J s, how would the universe be different?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, one consequence is that there would be considerably more energy in the universe. The energy of a photon is given by $E=h \nu$, and so if $h$ is larger by 34 orders of magnitude, then the energy of the universe due to the presence of light would be 34 orders of magnitude greater. In other words, we would probably all burn up... unless, of course, our bodies were now (also due to the revised Planck constant) capable of handling that kind of energy without exploding. That is, unless the electromagnetic force were to increase by a similar amount, the absorption of a single photon would GREATLY increase the energy of an electron. That electron would then almost certainly break away from its nucleus. Imagine that happening en masse, and you see that your body would ionize very quickly. It would become highly positively charged, at which point you would explode.
 
Consider also that most equations about the quantum "world" are based on the fact that h is so small. If h were large then most quantum events would be the norm. So, for example, wave-particle duality would be common.

One of my professors made a joke that we would get an A in class if we could quantum tunnel into the final exam. If h = 1 Js you could bounce back and forth in the hallway and actually do it.

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jacobi said:
I have an interesting 'What If' question. I understand that it was originally meant to be in jest, but I am interested to know what would happen. Here is the original joke: "There was a discussion in the math and physics departments of a university. It was about whether to allow calculators on the exams. After heated debate, the physics department decided in favor of allowing calculators because their 3 hour exam had one question: 'Describe the universe, if Planck's constant were equal to 1.'"
If Planck's constant, instead of being $$6.63 \times 10^{-34}$$ J s, were 1 J s, how would the universe be different?

In the usual MKS metric system is $\displaystyle h= 6.63\ 10^{- 34} \frac {k\ m^{2}}{s}$. In principle You can use a 'quantum metric system' $Q_{m} Q_{k} Q_{s}$ where is $\displaystyle h= 1\ \frac{Q_{k}\ Q_{m}^{2}}{Q_{s}}$ and in this case it would be...

$\displaystyle \frac{Q_{k}\ Q_{m}^{2}}{Q_{s}} = 6.63\ 10^{- 34} \frac {k\ m^{2}}{s}$

... and I don't know if such a metric system is very comfortable in our quotidian life (Wasntme)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
210
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top