Shearing / Cutting Force - Rubber bale

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and calculation of cutting forces for a hydraulic guillotine intended for cutting rubber bales. Participants explore the mechanics of cutting rubber, including the assumptions about shear strength and the implications of blade design on cutting efficiency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the cutting force using the formula F = A x Ss, leading to a surprisingly high force requirement of 1260 kN for a rubber bale, which contrasts with typical cutter specifications of 12-15 Tonne.
  • Another participant suggests that the cutting force is concentrated at the cutting edge and that a sharper blade reduces the required force, emphasizing the role of friction in the cutting process.
  • It is proposed that using a sloped blade design could reduce the cutting force needed, although this may complicate the support for flexible materials like rubber.
  • A participant questions whether the entire block is being sheared at once and suggests considering the width of the cutting edge for more accurate force calculations.
  • Reference to a study on cutting agar is provided, indicating that slicing actions are more effective for deformable materials, which may apply to rubber cutting as well.
  • Discussion includes the mechanics of cutting soft solids and the importance of blade angle in minimizing resistance and damage to the material being cut.
  • Examples of guillotine designs used for cutting paper and other materials are shared, highlighting variations in blade angles and cutting techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate calculations and methods for determining cutting forces, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the validity of the initial calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of cutting rubber and the limitations of existing calculations, as well as the need for empirical testing or reference to existing machinery for more accurate force assessments.

vivek_salman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have been assigned by my tutor to design a hydraulic guillotine (rubber bale cutter).
After designing its features of the hydraulic, cutting blade etc.

I tried to calculate the force needed of cutting a piece of Rubber bale (Natural as reference) having an ultimate tensile strength of 30 MPa (Shear strength assumed to be equal to tensile).

The maximum thickness of the rubber bale is fixed to 120 mm and width of the bale is 350 mm.
This set up would cater for the maximum cutting action since rubber material is spread all over the blades.

The equation I used was: F = A x Ss

where F is the cutting force, A is the shear area (120 x 350) mm² , and Ss is the Shear strength 30 MPa.

Using this equation the cutting force would be ridiculously large, 1260 kN or 128 Tonne.

But a normal rubber bale cutter has maximum 12 - 15 Tonne.

Can someone please point me in the right direction or correction ?
Books, examples and explanations are appreciated.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, I once designed a guillotine cutter for interfolded wax paper logs. The cutting force is concentrated at the cutting edge. The sharper the blade, the less the cutting force. A sharp blade has almost no cutting force.

The force to push the blade through the product is almost entirely due to friction between the sides of the blade and the product. You can demonstrate this by cutting a piece of rubber hose or vinyl tubing with a sharp knife. First, lay the hose flat on a board and push the knife through with a slicing motion. Second, bend the hose into a U-shape and cut into the outside of the U.

There is no good way to calculate the cutting force of rubber, so you need to either run a test or get values from existing machines. For the wax paper guillotine, we mounted a blade in an arbor press, then measured the cutting force by pulling on the press handle with a spring scale.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
Look online at some pictures of guillotine blades and you will see that they sloped so that they cut only a portion of the width of an article at any point of their travel. Doing so on your your cutting edge will considerably reduce your required cutting force; but, this style of blade requires a slotted table for the blade to slide into below the material and this could be an issue for the support of a flexible rubber material. An alternative might be to design your cutter with a cutting wheel (like a pizza cutter) that rolls across the table as it cuts the rubber and will have the same cutting force reducing property as the sloped guillotine blade.
 
Thank you for your Info.

Could someone help me to add this calculation of Guillotine blade with cutting force calculation?

Any reference regarding this complete calculation.

Thank you.
 
vivek_salman said:
The equation I used was: F = A x Ss

where F is the cutting force, A is the shear area (120 x 350) mm² , and Ss is the Shear strength 30 MPa.
Are you shearing the whole block at once?
Maybe you should use the width of the cutting edge of the blade.
 
Last edited:
Guillotine cutting Kautschuk.JPG


this rubber bale is 750 x 350 x 120 mm.
I want to cut it horizontally where cross section or cutting edge is 350 mm and thickness is 120 mm.
 
" This occurs through the slicing action of a blade which creates a critical local tension at the surface with minimal global compression of the bulk, while pure normal loading involves strong global deformation before fracture initiation and leads to material damage. In practice, sliding might limit the efficiency of this process, so that when cutting soft solids, we must impose a minimal normal force that enables fracture nucleation due to slicing. The same principle that holds for paper cuts also plays a role in the macabre guillotine: the angled blade is designed to slice through flesh sharply and do so with minimum resistance rather than squeeze it. "

The above quote also states that a normal (90°), i.e. blade flat to the material, cutting imposes the greatest required cutting force, as shown in the graphs in the report, and leads to material damage.
 
Stacks of paper are commonly trimmed to size using a guillotine. The stack is compressed by a platen, then the blade comes down at a 45 degree angle. The blade is parallel to the surface of the paper stack. Paperback books are trimmed to size by guillotine trimmers, and sometimes you will see 45 degree lines in the edge where the blade has a small nick in it.

I have also seen stacks of paper cut using a guillotine, where the blade travels vertically. The blade is parallel to the stack surface as shown in Post #7. One of these was the guillotine mentioned in Post #2, another was a machine for removing waste paper from steel cores, and one was a cutoff for air filter material.

The air filter material cutoff cut against a hardened steel roll. The depth of cut was VERY carefully adjusted to get a clean cut without dulling the blade. The waste paper guillotine was operated to cut almost to the core, with the last few layers removed by hand. All other paper cutting guillotines, both the 45 degree and vertical cutting, cut against a plastic block. As the blade sharpness decreased with use, the depth of cut was adjusted deeper, until the blade needed to be removed. A new blade was installed, and the plastic block flipped so the blade could cut against a new surface. The block was square and installed so the blade hit off center, so could be rotated and/or flipped 8 times before needing replacement. I believe those blocks were usually Nylatron, although UHMW may also have been used.

I'm not familiar with cutting rubber, so filter accordingly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K