Calculating total stress in bolts that holds an actuator?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on calculating the total stress in bolts that secure an actuator to a knife gate valve, specifically examining the adequacy of the bolts under various loading conditions. Participants explore the implications of shear stress, bending stress, and preload stress, as well as the overall safety factors involved in the design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents calculations for shear stress and preload stress, questioning whether the bolts can adequately support the actuator's weight when oriented horizontally.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of designing the bolt preload to exceed the combined forces on the joint, suggesting that the applied moment is distributed across the bolt pattern rather than affecting individual bolts.
  • A participant challenges the initial bending stress calculation, proposing an alternative method for determining the moment of inertia and resulting stress on the bolts.
  • Further calculations are presented to determine von Mises stress, with some participants questioning the accuracy of these calculations and discussing the influence of bending stress on individual bolts.
  • Participants discuss the safety factors associated with the yield strength of the bolts, with one suggesting adjustments to the installation torque based on calculated stresses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the accuracy of the bending stress calculations or the final von Mises stress. Multiple competing views remain regarding the appropriate safety factors and the adequacy of the bolt design under the specified loading conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential uncertainties in the calculations, including the choice of coordinate system and the assumptions made regarding the distribution of forces among the bolts. There are also discussions about the appropriate yield strength values for the bolt material.

Who May Find This Useful

Engineers and designers involved in mechanical design, particularly those working with bolted joints and actuator systems in valve applications, may find this discussion relevant.

WillemBouwer
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hi All! I am currently busy working on a new knife gate valve design. I have an actuator with a mass of 200 kg attached at the top of the valve. The bottom plate of the actuator is 28 mm thick and I am going to use this plate directly to fasten the actuator(see attached drawing for plate dimensions).
The fastning bolts will be as specified:
2xM16 Bolts at ∅445 P.C.D and 4xM16 Bolts at ∅160PCD...
Bolt material is Stainless Steel 304 A2-70 with properties: (Note:Please advice if this is correct)
Ultimate Tensile Strength (Stu): 700 MPa
Tensile Yield Strength (Sty): 420 MPa
Ultimate Shear Strength (Ssu): 490 MPa

I would like to determine if the bolts will be sufficient to hold the actuator when the valve is fitted in a horizontal position?

Relevant equations:
Shear Stress:
For circular sections: Ss = (4/3)*(V/A)
Where V = applied force (N) and A = Cross-sectional area of the Bolts (mm^2)
Normal Yield Stresses:
FSy*(M*c/I)/Sty ≤ 100 %.
Where M is moment created by the Centre of Mass of the Actuator working at 300 mm from plate (N.m), c = radius of bolts core (mm) and I = Moment of inertia (mm^4)
Preload Stress:
σ= F/A
where F = Preload force inside bolt caused by specific torque applied to bolts (N)

My calcs:
Preload Stress:
Recommended Bolt torque is 160 N.m
T = 0.2DF ( This is an equations I know works for bolts)
Thus F = 160/(0.2*0.016) = 50 kN
and σ= F/A
gives σ = 50000/(∏*13.5^2)/4 = 349 MPa

Shear stress because of weight:
Ss = (4/3)*(V/A)
with V = 1962/6 = 327 N/bolt
Ss = (4/3)*(327/(∏*13.5^2)/4)
Ss = 3.02 MPa

Now here comes the problem: I am relitavely sure that the C.O.M of the actuator(situated 300mm from the bolts) causes a moment at the bolts, which causes normal bending stress?

Then σ = (M)*(c)/I
then σ = (327*300)*(6.75)/(∏*(13.5)^4/64)
= 406 MPa

But if this is the case the bolts will surely not hold the actuator, but I am confinced that it should! Any verification on this will be much appreciated.

Next thing I should do will be to determine the max von mises stress and compare that to the proof stress of the bolt! Help on this is also needed...

Please check attached drawings for some info! Any replies is welcome!

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Bottom_plate_drawing.jpg
    Bottom_plate_drawing.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 1,048
  • SKG_ACTUATOR_BOLTS.jpg
    SKG_ACTUATOR_BOLTS.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 820
Engineering news on Phys.org
Keep in mind that for a bolted joint you are designing its preload such that it is higher by some safety factor than the combination of forces on the joint's bolt pattern. As long as the bolts in the joint have preload in the joint, and there is no shear sliding in the joint, any single one of the bolts cannot have a moment on it (other than torsion caused by tightening). Instead, the applied moment is spread across the bolt pattern as compressive and tensile forces (or shear as the case may be).
 
WillemBouwer: As mentioned by Mech_Engineer, your bending stress calculation currently appears to be incorrect. Is the vertical axis of your coordinate system (CS) the z axis, or the y axis? Assuming your vertically upward CS axis is called y, then the bolt pattern moment of inertia is, Ix = summation[(y^2)*Ab]. Therefore, Ix = (4 bolts){[(0.5*165)*sin(45 deg)]^2}*(0.25*pi*13.5^2) = 4(58.3363^2)*Ab = 1 948 477 mm^4.

Therefore, bolt applied tensile stress due to applied moment currently appears to be, sigma = M*c/Ix = [(300 mm)(1962 N)](58.3363 mm)/(1 948 477 mm^4) = 17.62 MPa, not 406 MPa.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply guys! I had a feeling the bending stresses was incorrect but knew the c.o.m should have some influence on the compression/tensile stress acting in the bolts!

nvn: The valve can be oriented in either the y or z axis as the vertical axis, so I have to bear in mind both. but if z is the vertical axis I don't think the bolts will fail at all, seeing that they only do I holding job!
I did not once think of this equation as I took a each bolt individually, but it makes sense to do them all together as they act together!

If I now have that Ss = 3.02 MPa, σ_preload stress = 359 MPa and σ_bending = 17.62 MPa then the von mises stress should be:
Svm = sqrt(S1^2 + S2^2 + S3^2 +3(Ss)^2)
= sqrt(359^2 + 17.62^2 - (359*17.62) + 3*(3.02)^2)
= 350 MPa
Is this correct or does it change for each bolt seeing that the bending stress is compressing for some bolts and works as tensile for others?

Then Nfs = 420/350 = 1.2 ? is this right?
 
WillemBouwer: Your von Mises stress looks incorrect. Nonetheless, your shear stress is currently low; therefore, you currently do not need to worry about von Mises stress. I.e., you can currently neglect shear stress. You can currently assume approximately 30 % of the applied tensile stress goes to the bolt. And let's currently assume the torque uncertainty factor is 1.30; and let's assume the yield factor of safety is currently 1.30. I will continue using your bolt diameter in post 1, which is conservative. For A2-70 bolts, I think Sty = 450 MPa, not 420 MPa. Using these assumptions, the final, factored bolt axial stress is currently as follows.

sigma_f = 1.30*sigma_i + 0.30*1.30*sigma
= 1.30*349 + 0.30*1.30*17.62 = 460.6 MPa

Nfs = 450/460.6 = 0.9770

Therefore, this indicates you would need to decrease bolt installation torque to, e.g., 150 N*m.
 
Last edited:
Thanks nvn! I took the torque as 150 N.m and found that sigma_f = 431 MPa this gives a net safety factor of 1.04! This is okay I guess, seeing that we already worked at a safety factor of 1.3 for yielding!
So I will just state on my assembly bill that the recommended torque on the bolts should be 150 N.m...
Thanks for the help! Should be able to get the other valve sizes correct!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K