MHB Shifting Graphs: Finding Corresponding Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taryn1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Points
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding corresponding points between the graphs of y = f(x) and y = f(x + 2) - 1. The original graph passes through the points (0, 1), (1, 2), and (2, 3). By applying the transformations, the corresponding points are calculated as follows: (0, 1) shifts to (-2, 0), (1, 2) shifts to (-1, 1), and (2, 3) shifts to (0, 2). The participants confirm that these transformations align with the answers provided in the textbook. Understanding the shifts clarifies the problem and resolves the initial confusion.
Taryn1
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I feel like this should be a super easy problem, but I'm not understanding something about it.

The graph of y = f(x) passes through the points (0, 1), (1, 2), and (2, 3). Find the corresponding points on he graph y = f(x + 2) - 1. I graphed the (x + 2) - 1, but what does it mean by 'corresponding points'? The three points I named earlier lie on the line, but that's not the right answer (I have the answers in the back of the book). I just don't know how to get there correctly...

Here's the graph I got:

View attachment 4694
 

Attachments

  • wolframalpha.png
    wolframalpha.png
    27.7 KB · Views: 107
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Taryn,

The graph of $y = f(x + 2) - 1$ (or $y + 1 = f(x + 2)$) is obtained from the graph of $y = f(x)$ by shifting $2$ units to the left and $1$ unit down. So if I'm understanding the problem correctly, the point $(0,1)$ that lies on $y = f(x)$ corresponds to the point $(0 - 2, 1 - 1) = (-2,0)$ on the graph of $y = f(x + 2) - 1$. Similarly the point $(1,2)$ corresponds to $(1 - 2, 2 - 1) = (-1,1)$. If you display the answers here then I'll be sure exactly what correspondence they mean.
 
Thanks! That makes sense now. That's exactly the answers the book had. :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
988
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top