MHB Shifting Graphs: Finding Corresponding Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taryn1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Points
Taryn1
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I feel like this should be a super easy problem, but I'm not understanding something about it.

The graph of y = f(x) passes through the points (0, 1), (1, 2), and (2, 3). Find the corresponding points on he graph y = f(x + 2) - 1. I graphed the (x + 2) - 1, but what does it mean by 'corresponding points'? The three points I named earlier lie on the line, but that's not the right answer (I have the answers in the back of the book). I just don't know how to get there correctly...

Here's the graph I got:

View attachment 4694
 

Attachments

  • wolframalpha.png
    wolframalpha.png
    27.7 KB · Views: 106
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Taryn,

The graph of $y = f(x + 2) - 1$ (or $y + 1 = f(x + 2)$) is obtained from the graph of $y = f(x)$ by shifting $2$ units to the left and $1$ unit down. So if I'm understanding the problem correctly, the point $(0,1)$ that lies on $y = f(x)$ corresponds to the point $(0 - 2, 1 - 1) = (-2,0)$ on the graph of $y = f(x + 2) - 1$. Similarly the point $(1,2)$ corresponds to $(1 - 2, 2 - 1) = (-1,1)$. If you display the answers here then I'll be sure exactly what correspondence they mean.
 
Thanks! That makes sense now. That's exactly the answers the book had. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
978
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top