I Shooting an electron past a positive nucleus (trajectory)

AI Thread Summary
When an electron is shot horizontally past a proton, the trajectory can be analyzed as a two-body problem, though it simplifies to a one-body problem with the proton fixed. The distance of closest approach can be derived using conservation of energy and angular momentum principles. The relationship between scattering angle and trajectory can be expressed using hyperbolic parameters, specifically the formulas L² = γb²/a and E = γ/2a, where γ = e²/m. For further understanding, references to Rutherford scattering provide additional insights into the behavior of charged particles in such interactions. This analysis highlights the importance of classical mechanics in understanding particle trajectories in electromagnetic fields.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
TL;DR Summary
An electron is shot horizontally. There is a proton located somewhere else, but not in the horizontal path of the electron. Is there a distance of closest approach, and how do you derive it? A physical explanation would be appreciated too. Feel free to use any variables.
An electron is shot horizontally. There is a proton located somewhere else, but not in the horizontal path of the electron. Is there a distance of closest approach, and how do you derive it? A physical explanation would be appreciated too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's straightforward as a one-body problem but a little more subtle as a two-body problem. For the one-body (fixed proton) scenario it's enough to conserve energy and angular momentum about the proton. If you want the scattering angle/trajectory then you can relate these to the hyperbolic parameters ##a## and ##b## with the standard formulae ##L^2 = \gamma b^2 / a## and ##E = \gamma / 2a## [where ##\gamma = e^2/m##]; the proton is at the far focus.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and PeroK
You could search for Rutherford scattering. There's quite a bit online about this.
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top