Short improper integral question (how to rewrite?)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on rewriting an improper integral using substitution. A participant suggests substituting x with -x, which raises concerns about the legality of the operation. Another clarifies that this is a valid approach through u-substitution, specifically u = -x, and emphasizes the importance of adjusting the integration boundaries accordingly. The original poster confirms understanding after this explanation. The thread concludes with the poster expressing gratitude for the assistance.
vantz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f0uvk4.jpg



Homework Equations


b8papu.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution


33wtm6r.jpg


I'm trying to rewrite the integral as shown

Most probably a real simple answer

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first integral, try substituting x for -x.
 
I don't understand, wouldn't that be illegal to do?
 
vantz said:
I don't understand, wouldn't that be illegal to do?

Yes, it would. But Compuchip meant to do a u-substitution. u=(-x), du=(-dx).
 
Exactly. And don't forget the integration boundaries as well.
 
I have it now. Thank you
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K