Short question about L infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter futurebird
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Short
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the function f(x) = |1/x| in the context of L-infinity spaces, particularly focusing on its essential supremum (esssup) over various measurable sets E, including the interval (-1, 1).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions under which f(x) is considered to be in L-infinity, questioning the existence of the esssup on specific sets, particularly when x=0 is included in E.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of including or excluding certain points in the set E, with some participants providing examples to illustrate their points. The discussion reflects a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the essential supremum and its conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering various measurable sets and their implications for the function's properties, including the measure of sets where the function exceeds certain values.

futurebird
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
I want to say that f(x) = |1/x| is in L-infinity(E) when m(E)<infinity because the function has and esssup on any measurable set, E. Even if E = (-1, 1) f(0) is not a problem since it is only one point...

But wait... what *is* the esssup for this function on (-1, 1)? I think it might not have one. This is why I'm confused.

:(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't seem too confused to me. It doesn't have an esssup on (-1,1).
 
Ok. So then it's not in L-infinity when x=0 is in E.

(slowly this starts to make more sense...)
 
Not exactly. E could be (-oo, -1) union [0] union (1,oo) and it would be in Loo.
 
oh good point.
 
You could have f(x) = sin(x) except on the rationals where it is 1/x and anything at 0. This would have an esssup of 1 because the set of x where |f(x)| > 1 has measure 0.
 
Thanks, that's a good example to think about.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K