Shorten equations with math notations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadatPhysicsguy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves identifying the three smallest Pythagorean triangles and exploring methods to demonstrate their properties without exhaustive calculations. The subject area is primarily focused on number theory and geometry, specifically the Pythagorean theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of generalizing the demonstration of Pythagorean triples, questioning the definition of "smallest" in this context. There are suggestions to use mathematical notation and modular arithmetic to clarify the problem and reduce the number of cases to consider.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on how to approach the problem. Some suggest programming solutions, while others propose mathematical reasoning and notation to streamline the process. There is no explicit consensus on the best method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential ambiguity in the term "smallest" and consider different interpretations, such as area versus side lengths. There is also mention of the impracticality of writing out numerous cases in detail.

BadatPhysicsguy
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Show that the three smallest pythagorean triangles are (3, 4, 5), (6, 8, 10) and (5,12, 13).

Homework Equations


a^2 + b^2 = c^2

The Attempt at a Solution


The obvious thing to do would be to simply show that a triangle with the hypothenuse 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 12 simply do not satisfy the pythagorean equation (a^2+b^2=c^2) but instead of showing this through 11 separate solutions, is there anyway to shorten this, generalize it or use something like a sum notation (sigma)? Would be pretty unneccesary to waste two pages on simply writing it all out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write a computer program to do that for you. It won't be hard!
 
First question is what is meant by smallest here? The most reasonable is by area, so it might not be ok only to look at hypotenuses less than 13.
Assuming area, better to work in terms of the length of the shortest side - fewer choices.
It is possible to deduce a general form for solutions. Not sure if you're expected to be able to do that.
 
I don't know about shortening anything, but it does clarify to put some mathematical notation on the problem. So for example say the triangle edge lengths are labelled ##a##, ##b## and (hypotenuse) ##c##, with ##0<a \leq b<c##.

Then you can review possibilities based on ##a## and ##b##. For a particular ##a##, you could infer where to stop with ##b## by finding the smallest ##n## such that ##(n+1)^2 - n^2 = 2n + 1 > a^2##

Also, you could investigate square numbers under modular arithmetic. This would let you show that ##a## and ##b## needs at least one multiple of 3 and one even number (mod 4 tells you this) and (interestingly) that either ##a##, ##b##, ##(a+b)## or ##(b-a)## must be a multiple of 7.

Of course you could just draw up an exhaustive table too. Sometimes brute force is quicker, especially in Excel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K