Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the problem of finding the shortest distance between two points, A and B, with a vertical distance d and a horizontal distance s. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the distance and the implications of differentiability in determining the shortest path. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification.
Discussion Character
- Mathematical reasoning
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant proposes that the shortest distance can be expressed as ##y=\sqrt{s^2+d^2}## and suggests that the path should be extremized by considering an intermediary point C.
- Another participant corrects the distance expression to include the absolute value, stating it should be ##y = |x| + \sqrt{d^2 + (s-x)^2}##, noting that this expression is not differentiable at ##x = 0##.
- Some participants discuss the implications of the triangle inequality, asserting that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than or equal to the length of the third side.
- There is confusion regarding the use of absolute values in the distance expression, with participants expressing uncertainty about how negative values for x affect the length of segment AC.
- One participant introduces the concept of the "first law of the butterfly," suggesting that the shortest distance is a zigzag line, while another humorously contrasts this with a crow's sense.
- Several participants express difficulties with quoting mathematical expressions accurately in the forum, leading to discussions about the limitations of the quoting feature.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct formulation of the distance or the implications of differentiability. Multiple competing views and corrections are presented throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made about the distance expressions and the implications of differentiability at specific points. The discussion also highlights the challenges of accurately representing mathematical expressions in the forum format.