Should Climate Change Have Its Own Subforum in Earth Sciences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherwood Botsford
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Creating a subforum for climate change within Earth Sciences has been deemed problematic due to the political and misinformation aspects surrounding the topic. The forum previously had a climate change section, but it was removed due to the negative consequences of discussions that often devolved into unproductive arguments. The complexities of climate change intersect with psychology and sociology, making it difficult to maintain a scientific focus. Without a subject matter expert to guide discussions, the forum cannot support a dedicated climate change subforum. Ultimately, the consensus is that discussions should remain limited to published scientific findings to avoid ideological conflicts.
Sherwood Botsford
Messages
91
Reaction score
22
For some sensitive issues that have a political component in addition to a physics ones, would there be merit in creating sub-forums -- e.g. climate change as a sub-forum of Earth Sciences.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There was one. There isn't any more.

Of all the "Tried it, bad idea" forum topics on PF, I think Climate Change is at the top.

Not only is there no forum, it was (is?) a banned topic anywhere on the forum. (Or is that just climate change politics?)
 
Sherwood Botsford said:
For some sensitive issues that have a political component in addition to a physics ones, would there be merit in creating sub-forums -- e.g. climate change as a sub-forum of Earth Sciences.
The consequences would unfortunately be too negative if we did this. The subject is too loaded by misinformation, political goals, and ignorance. Furthermore it touches phenomena like psychology, sociology and similar fields which provide reasons to explain human behavior, again causes of non scientific responses.

We do not discuss it politically for the same reason we do not discuss philosophy, religion or politics in general: a lack of expertise, but even more the knowledge that such threads always end up people arguing in an unpleasant manner defending positions which are not backed by evidence, although hardly to dismantle. Those discussions will sooner or later arrive at a point, where ideologies come into play, and that is the point at which you cannot reason anymore. It would be ugly. And it would be as senseless as it would be unsolvable.

Go into any public room and look for discussions about vaccination. It makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu and Bystander
One other issue that we struggled with back when we still allowed wide-ranging Climate Change threads: We figured out that we really needed a subject matter expert on the Mentor staff to handle those discussions in the same way that we can with the other technical forums.

We have great subject matter experts in our Mentor and SA ranks for all of our technical forums, but we couldn't find such a person to take over Mentoring a Climate Change forum. Once we realized that fundamental issue, it became clear that we could only support narrow discussions of Climate Change that are discussions of the published science only.
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, Bystander and BillTre
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top