Should Great Britain abolish its monarchy?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shay10825
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether Great Britain should abolish its monarchy. Participants explore various perspectives on the monarchy's relevance, historical significance, and potential impact on society and governance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the monarchy is a waste of resources and should be abolished, citing its degradation to celebrity status and the irrelevance of hereditary leadership.
  • Others defend the monarchy as a historical figurehead that contributes to national identity and tourism revenue, suggesting that its abolition would not significantly change governance.
  • A few participants express indifference towards the monarchy, indicating that it does not affect them personally or suggesting that it is a trivial matter.
  • There are discussions about the differences between England, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, with some participants emphasizing the importance of using the correct terminology.
  • One participant humorously suggests a coup to replace the royal family with the Kennedy family, raising questions about public sentiment towards such a change.
  • Some participants note that the monarchy's abolition might have more impact on territories like the British Channel Islands than on the UK itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on whether the monarchy should be abolished. Multiple competing views remain, reflecting a mix of support, opposition, and indifference towards the monarchy.

Contextual Notes

Participants exhibit varying levels of understanding regarding the political and geographical distinctions between England, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, which may influence their arguments.

Should the monarchy in Great Britain be abolished?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 54.0%
  • No

    Votes: 23 46.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • #61
Ah, so Great Brittain is Grande Bretagne in French.

But doesn't that piss off the French people living in Bretagne?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Telos said:
Ah, so Great Brittain is Grande Bretagne in French.

But doesn't that piss off the French people living in Bretagne?

Not comparing size of each Bretagne then it could be other way around, English could be pissed off that their country is called after French district Bretagne
 
  • #64
If anyone tried a military coup the Queen would order the worlds best and most powerful army in the world to crush you ****ers. The army swear legence to the Queen. The royal perogative gives her the legal right to rage any war without the say of the british people or parliament. What the rest of the world and most Britons don't realize is that the queen has control of the best armed forces in the world. Deep down everyone loves the royal family and what they stand for. Without them the world would be a very different place. America, Britain and the commonwealth owe a great deal to them, as our wealth would never have existed without them.
 
  • #65
The monarchy stays, simple as that. Brings in far too much money to get rid of them.
 
  • #66
Hey Andy, look! A new comrade!

Welcome crazy fairy!
 
  • #67
WTF? Crazy fairy?
 
  • #68
Britain is also often used when talking about the island of Great Britain.

The term "Britain" came from one of the inital inhabitants of the Island, and thus was coined to be used as the island...
England, Scotland and Wales. Wales is a principality. There are also Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territories, but nobody wants to know about those, and nobody really knows where they all are anyway.
What about Scotland? Not only are we a Principality (edit: actually Scotland is a kingdom not a principality) but we have our own languages (like Wales but more of them) and we have our own parliament :-) And if SNP get in Power we will be a separate country again after 300 odd years of a union that has done the Scots more harm than good /rant

I voted No. The UK isn't a Republic and never will be, however we all know the Stewarts should be on the thrown ;-)

I do, however, tend to agree with Waste because the current family is actually of German descent.
True, but all the arostorcratcies in Europe are related.. The English are Anglo saxons after all..
 
Last edited:
  • #69
I don't think Wales is considered a country, although they have given it some limited home rule. It was conquered in the middle ages and since then has formed part of the country England. It is a principality, and Charles is its prince. What did you think "Prince of Wales" meant?

When the Stewarts were on the thrown of England and Scotland both countries were still countries in there own right, but shared a king.. Wales is a separate country in my opinion...

Isn't it funny that Great Britain is smaller than Britain (when using Britain to refer to the entire country)?

Britain isn't a country! Neither is Great Britain...
 
  • #70
If anyone tried a military coup the Queen would order the worlds best and most powerful army in the world to crush you ****ers. The army swear legence to the Queen. The royal perogative gives her the legal right to rage any war without the say of the british people or parliament. What the rest of the world and most Britons don't realize is that the queen has control of the best armed forces in the world. Deep down everyone loves the royal family and what they stand for. Without them the world would be a very different place. America, Britain and the commonwealth owe a great deal to them, as our wealth would never have existed without them.

Heh, and most of "her" Army is now Scottish not English (Well the best troops are : SAS) So the Queen better not deside to wage war up north again hehe
 
  • #71
Absolutely nothing; a vacuous false-title of antiquated good-for-nothingness. Why else would we be having the discussion of abolishing a monarchy? It's not like it would be a "revolution."

Would it?

For someone who knows very little about the UK you don't half have some opinions...

And YES it would be a revolution!
 
  • #72
Wow.. I think I am getting an insight about how annoying it must be for the Americans here having to listen to "foreigners" Rant about there political systems and there country..

What I mean by this is do we sound as ignorant when talking about your constitution and even basic Geography as you guys are sounding about the U.K. ?

No offence intended
 
  • #73
I can't believe there is soo much confusion over this.
 
  • #74
Nobody's even mentioned the Isle of Man which happens to have the oldest surviving parliament in the world and funnily enough, although situated in the Irish Sea between Ireland and Great Britain aren't part of the E.U.
btw Wales IS a country in it's own right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
11K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 640 ·
22
Replies
640
Views
74K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K