Should I install my OS on a low-capacity SSD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kutt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    install Os Ssd
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suitability of installing an operating system on a low-capacity solid state drive (SSD), specifically in the context of building a high-performance gaming rig. Participants explore recommendations for SSDs, their capacity, and the impact on system performance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a 120GB SSD would be sufficient for installing Windows 8 and a couple of games, recommending specific models like the OCZ Vertex 3, Crucial M4, and OCZ Agility 3.
  • Another participant advises against OCZ drives due to high failure rates and recommends the Crucial M4 or Samsung 840, arguing that 64GB is too small and suggesting either 128GB or 256GB as better options.
  • A third participant agrees with the previous recommendation, stating that a 128GB SSD is adequate if the user manages data storage carefully, while suggesting a 256GB drive for those less disciplined about file management.
  • There is mention of improvements in newer OCZ drives, but a preference for Intel, Samsung, or Crucial products is expressed for reliability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the performance benefits of using an SSD, but there is disagreement regarding the recommended brands and capacities, with some advocating for larger drives and others expressing concerns about specific manufacturers.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the reliability of different SSD brands and the adequacy of storage capacities, indicating that personal usage habits may influence the choice of SSD size.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals building gaming rigs or considering SSD options for operating system installations may find this discussion relevant.

Kutt
Messages
237
Reaction score
1
I'm putting together a new high-performance gaming rig and wanted to ask someone here if they could recommend a fast SATA III low-capacity solid state drive to install Windows 8 on.

Boot times should be dramatically faster compared to an HDD.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
You could probably do with a 120GB SSD. Big enough for windows and a couple games to be installed and run from the drive. I would get a 2nd normal drive used for data storage. But yes, an SSD would noticbly improve your system's performance

i'd go for one of these 3
OCZ Vertex 3
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-227-706&IsVirtualParent=1

Crucial M4
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-148-442&IsVirtualParent=1

OCZ Agility 3 (We have a few of these at work)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-227-726&IsVirtualParent=1
 
I wouldn't recommend OCZ drives. They have the highest failure rates of all manufacturers.

The Crucial M4 is a good one, either that or a Samsung 840 (if you are able to obtain a Samsung 830 for the same money, go for this instead).

64 GB is to small, you should either go for 128 or 256 GB.
 
Agree entirely with clancy688. The system SSD will transform your PC experience.
Also agree that 128 GB is adequate if you are very disciplined about keeping your data and media files on a separate drive. If you are casual about putting stuff away, a 256 GB drive is a better bet.
The latest OCZ drives have apparently gotten noticeably better, but for a user happier with products that are made by the supplier, rather than repackaged merchant market chips, Intel, Samsung or Crucial (Micron Technologies) fill the bill.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K