Should I Relearn Algebra Before Studying Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter conure
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Master
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around whether an individual should relearn algebra and trigonometry before studying physics. Participants explore the relationship between mathematics and physics, discussing the necessary mathematical foundations for understanding physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that mastering algebra and trigonometry is essential before tackling physics, suggesting that learning them sequentially may be more effective.
  • Others propose that it is possible to learn math and physics in parallel, emphasizing that physics presumes a certain level of mathematical competence.
  • One participant recommends focusing on "mathematical methods of physics" books, which provide practical applications of math relevant to physics, rather than pure math texts.
  • There is a discussion about the varying definitions of "algebra" across different educational systems, with one participant noting that what is considered algebra in the USA may differ from other countries.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of algebraic manipulations in physics, indicating that a solid understanding of these concepts is vital for success in the subject.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether to relearn algebra before studying physics, with some advocating for a sequential approach and others suggesting a parallel learning strategy. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions about the level of mathematical competence required for studying physics, and the discussion touches on the potential confusion arising from different educational terminologies related to algebra.

conure
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I studied algebra a few years ago and have unfortunately forgotten most of what I have learned. I am very interested in self-tutoring myself in physics, probably with a combination of online lectures and some textbooks I own.

Do you recommend I re-learn all of algebra and trig before I begin?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Definitely. Math is the language of physics, so trying to learn physics without first understanding math is like trying to read a French novel without first learning French. It's not impossible, but you'll end up having to learn the math and physics simultaneously. It's probably easier to attack them one at a time.
 
Do it in parallell.
Physics PRESUMES mastery of algebra and trigs.
 
Don't stop with Algebra, also study Trig and calculus, at a minimum. There is some posibibiliy for doing calculus along side of physics.

Learn as much math as you can.
 
Pure math books might be daunting and discouraging for somebody just wanting to dive into the physics, especially without a guidance from a professional.
Perhaps rather than picking up a book on algebra or calulus as such, you could get one of those "mathematical methods of physics" type of books. These are for students of physics who begin their higher education, and are expected to be able to follow the physics lectures from the get go. As such these are crash courses in the maths that you're bound to encounter, but without anything more fancy beyond that. They're very focused on gaining the practical understanding - this is what it is, this is how to do it, here are the problems for you to solve(lots of them!).

I'd start with one of these(e.g., Mary L.Boas "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences") and branch out to pure math only when you feel like you really need it to better understand the subject, or find something particularly interesting. At that point you should be able to make an informed choice as to what to look for and what to omit.

Keep in mind, these usually assume secondary school(high school) level of competence.
 
In the USA at least, algebra and trigonometry are considered to be "secondary school(high school) level of competence", and prerequisites for books such as Boas.

I suspect that we may not be thinking about "algebra" as the same thing. I think in some countries the term "algebra" is used for what is often called "abstract algebra" in the USA: group theory, etc. That's not what the OP is talking about.
 
Oh. That... actually explains a lot. Cheers.
 
I'm curious... what do you call the basic operations of rearranging equations and solving them for unknown quantities, that one learns in high school (what we're calling "algebra" here)?
 
jtbell said:
I'm curious... what do you call the basic operations of rearranging equations and solving them for unknown quantities, that one learns in high school (what we're calling "algebra" here)?
O.k., so this is a bit tricky. Technically speaking you'd call it the equivalent of "elementary algebra". But I had to look that up, since the term is never actually used during the primary or secondary education. You never "take algebra", there's just a monolithic "maths" course, encompassing everything from geometry and trigonometry to elementary algebra and calculus, where you learn specific elements without categorising them into separate branches.

During high school, people will usually learn about trigonometric functions, and algebraic expressions, some might learn about basic differential calculus, but will be unable to define algebra or calculus(there isn't even an equivalent term in the language at all!) as such. They should be able to define geometry and trigonometry, as these are more intuitivelly apparent.

The first time one usually gets to encounter the term "algebra" is during the higher education, as parts of "general algebra", which appears to be homologous with abstract algebra as far as I can tell after a bit of net combing.

I'm talking about Poland, by the way.


Anyway, this has been very educational. I thought I had bridged the language gap when I learned that when somebody says they took calculus in high school they don't mean to say they mastered differential equations, but it seems there's more. :frown:
 
  • #10
I'm not even done with my undergrad yet and there have been few courses that I've made it through without using any multivariate calculus; so to say the least, the algebraic manipulations are absolutely vital in physics. Otherwise, good luck memorizing a nearly infinite set of combinations of formulas and variables to avoid doing so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K