Should Mentors Receive Public Criticism for Their Voluntary Work on Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsisphirst
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Public criticism of mentors on forums is deemed inappropriate and unkind, as they are volunteers dedicated to maintaining standards. Disagreements should be addressed privately or with site administrators rather than publicly shaming mentors. Some users express frustration over lack of communication regarding warnings and bans, feeling their concerns are ignored. Despite these issues, there is a call for gratitude towards mentors who contribute to the community. Overall, fostering respectful dialogue and seeking clarification through proper channels is encouraged.
physicsisphirst
Messages
233
Reaction score
3
i'm really surprised that even here some people publically chastise mentors on these excellent forums. mentors are volunteers and are maintaining a standard here. they are doing the job that they are supposed to be doing.

if there is a disagreement, surely it can be handled via PM or the matter can even be taken up with the site admin in a civilized and courteous manner. public criticism is both inappropriate and unkind.

it is unfortunate, in my humblest opinion and experience, for anyone to be complaining on these forums in this fashion, literally accusing mentors of violating some inalienable rights supposedly owed us, simply because we have been granted the privilege of typing a few words on a screen.

i think it much preferable to show our gratitude towards people who give their time and energy in making these forums a better place instead of irately accusing them of violating this precious freedom of screech.

in friendship,
prad
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
if there is a disagreement, surely it can be handled via PM or the matter can even be taken up with the site admin in a civilized and courteous manner. public criticism is both inappropriate and unkind.

Have you ever tried your own reccomendation? I have asked on several occassions, for an explanation of the treatment I have recieved, by email to the mentor concerned, I have yet to receive a reply.

Some time ago I received 'warning number 7' I have not yet received notification of warnings 1 to 6. No reply to request for explanation.

I was banned without reason or notification from posting new threads to all forums, no reply to request for explanation. I am still banned from Theory Development, where my old thread has been closed, again without any reason being given.

Look at the comments about Theory Development made by mentors and ask yourself if it represents the sort of atitude required to judge entries.

I have been imformed that my work has been used for debate by two higher education schools and one amateur science debating group. I have also received one correction from a leading astrophysicist when I quoted him incorrectly; this indicates that my work cannot be wholly without merit; except in the opinion of PF mentors.

When voluntary subscritions were requested I made a small donation , but it was what I could afford, now we are asked for regular subscriptions but is the service going to treat regular subscribers any better?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
elas said:
Some time ago I received 'warning number 7' I have not yet received notification of warnings 1 to 6. No reply to request for explanation.
I cannot comment on the rest, but you did not receive warning number 7: you received a warning that counts as 7 points (there is a 15 point limit).

If you can't resolve a matter with a mentor, contact the site administrator or start a topic in the feedback forum. Starting a topic doesn't mean attacking a mentor, but rather ask for a clarification of the situation.
 
Thank-you for this limited reply, if only other mentors made the same effort perhaps I could make some progress, at present I am still looking for another way of getting a debate going.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top