Should the oriatation of the cell be like hexagonal lattices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter saray1360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the creation of supercells for single-layer ZnO, specifically addressing the unit cell configuration and orientation. It is established that the unit cell must include both zinc (Zn) and oxygen (O) atoms, typically one of each, to accurately represent the material's properties. The orientation of the cell can be hexagonal (90, 90, 120 degrees) or cubic (90, 90, 90 degrees), with the choice depending on the computational goals. For efficiency, it is recommended to minimize the number of atoms in the supercell to reduce calculation time, especially for band structure and ab-initio molecular dynamics calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of supercell construction in computational materials science
  • Familiarity with zinc oxide (ZnO) crystal structure
  • Knowledge of ab-initio molecular dynamics
  • Experience with band structure calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research supercell optimization techniques for ZnO
  • Learn about the implications of unit cell orientation on material properties
  • Explore ab-initio molecular dynamics software options
  • Study band structure calculation methods in density functional theory (DFT)
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for computational materials scientists, crystallographers, and researchers involved in the study of zinc oxide and its applications in electronic devices.

saray1360
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
Dear all,

I have got abit mixed up by the way different articles make supercells. As an example the below article:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/0511/0511274v3.pdf

for making the super cell for the single layer ZnO:

1. How should we make the unit cell?
2. How amny atoms should we consider there in a unit cell? (should it be more than two atoms: 1-zn and 1-O necessarilly, why?)
3. Should the oriatation of the cell be like hexagonal lattices (90 90 120) or we should change it to a cubic one? (90 90 90)


Regards,
Sara
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello,

It all depends on what you want to calculate, but a supercell should be chosen with calculation time in mind. For simple lattice parameter and band structure structure calculations, try to use the smallest supercell as possible; i.e. minimize the number of atoms in your supercell. If you are planning on doing ab-initio molecular-dynamics you will want to keep the number of atoms as small as possible because calculation time scales with the number of atoms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K