Finding High Symmetry Points for Wurtzite Structure with 12 Atoms

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter saray1360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Symmetry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding high symmetry points in the wurtzite structure, specifically for a unit cell containing 12 atoms. Participants explore the implications of lattice symmetry on the determination of these points and seek methods for calculating them in a hexagonal lattice context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that high symmetry points are typically associated with standard numbers of atoms in a unit cell, suggesting that changes in atom count may alter these points.
  • Another participant asserts that the Brillouin zone is defined by lattice symmetry rather than the number of atoms, indicating that conventions exist for representing band structures within this zone.
  • A participant expresses urgency in needing to calculate specific high symmetry points (Gamma, A, H, L, M, K) for a hexagonal lattice and provides a k-point grid for context.
  • A link to a resource for calculating k-points is shared, potentially offering tools or methods relevant to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods for calculating high symmetry points, and multiple viewpoints regarding the relationship between lattice symmetry and atom count are presented.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in representing high-dimensional data, as well as the potential for differing conventions in the representation of band structures and k-space paths.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers or students working with wurtzite structures, particularly those interested in computational methods for determining high symmetry points in crystal lattices.

saray1360
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
hi,

I have found a website in which it has described how to find high symmetry points for wurtzite structure. Here is its address:
http://cmt.dur.ac.uk/sjc/thesis_mcg/node53.html

But, as I know these points are being used for standard numbers of atoms for example in a wurtzite system we should have 4 atoms in the unit cell and if we change the number of atoms these points change!

Please let me know how I can calculate the high symmetry points for a unit cell with 12 atoms in a hexagonal lattice such as wurtzite structure of ZnO nanowires?

Thanks,
Sara
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The brillouin zone is determined by the lattice symmetry, not the placement (or number) of atoms in the unit cell.

What they are describing there (which "paths in k-space" along which to calculate the bandstructure), there have appeared some standards for each lattice symmetry, but ultimately it is a just a convention: We'd like to have and represent the bandstructure in the entire brillouin zone, but it is far easier to represent slices of this. Which slices are important to you, or is enough to feel like you "covered enough" is up to you or just a convention.

A similar problem you probably have seen is how one represents the electron orbitals for materials. It is just difficult to represent higher dimensional data. Usually we cut a plane (or line) through and show the densities on this surface, or show a 3-D model with the surface of a constant chosen density for the orbital.
 
Dear all,

It is trivial, but please let me know how I can clculate high symmetry points for hexagonal lattice. I know the points are gamma, A, H , L, M and K but I do not know how to calculate them. For example I have a k-point grid in reciprocal lattice as follows:

7.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 7.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 5.0

Please do help me, it is really urgent for me.

Regards,
sara
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
23K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
35K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K