Should URGENT! and ASAP! Be Banned in Homework Help Titles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ben Niehoff
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
There is a discussion about banning the use of "URGENT!" and "ASAP!" in homework help titles, with suggestions for a bold warning in the section guidelines. Participants express that using these terms can be seen as rude since volunteers help on their own time and may choose to ignore such requests. Some believe that a general announcement indicating these threads are likely to be overlooked could be beneficial. Others argue that it may not solve the problem, as many users would still seek quick responses regardless of urgency. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of managing expectations in a volunteer-driven forum.
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,892
Reaction score
171
Can there be some sort of big, bold warning in the Homework Help section forbidding the use of "URGENT!" or "ASAP!" in any thread title? There is probably already something in the homework help guidelines, but nobody seems to read those anyway.

Perhaps also a brief explanation would be in order, that we who help them on their homework are here during our free time, for no pay, and do so only because we are nice and sometimes enjoy it. To make any demands on the time frame in which one is helped is especially rude (and I know that I have occasionally countered with rude, unhelpful responses...).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thought about it, but I think it would be abused. Why wouldn't everyone want to get the quickest answer possible even if it wasn't truly urgent.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Thought about it, but I think it would be abused. Why wouldn't everyone want to get the quickest answer possible even if it wasn't truly urgent.

I think you read it how I did to start with, Greg. The OP is suggesting a phrase that asks members not to write that their thread is homework, as opposed to bold letters saying "urgent".
 
I just ignore them when they post URGENT for homework help. I get to it in the same order as I would any other post (or maybe just a tad more slowly :rolleyes:). If it REALLY bugs you, you don't have to answer those at all. Pick another thread where someone has been patiently waiting a while with no responses, and give them some help.
 
It doesn't particularly bug me and I don't think deliberately misleading students is a good idea. Since it is a forum where helpers are volunteers you can pick and choose which threads you want to help with. I'd suggest just ignoring them.
 
I didn't suggest deliberately misleading anyone. I think people were confused by my opening post.

I generally do ignore those threads, yes. I just thought a general announcement to say that such threads are likely to be ignored would be helpful.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
22K
Replies
0
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
25K
Replies
0
Views
21K
Replies
1
Views
28K
Back
Top