Why Isn't C5 a Crystal Point Group?

AI Thread Summary
C5 is not classified as a crystal point group because it does not meet the specific symmetry requirements of crystallography, which dictate that rotation angles must be fractions of 2π corresponding to n values of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 6. While C5 is a point symmetry that fixes a point, it fails to map the vertices of a structure, such as a hexagon, onto themselves, which is essential for a symmetry operation in crystal systems. The discussion highlights that C5 would suggest a pentagonal crystal system, which does not exist in crystallography. Therefore, despite being a mathematical group and point symmetry, C5 cannot be a crystal point group. Understanding these definitions clarifies why C5 is excluded from this classification.
WolfOfTheSteps
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Show that the C5 group is not a crystal point group."

2. Relevant information

1) "There exists another type of symmetry operation, called point symmetry, which leaves a point in the structure invariant"

2) "In crystallography, the angle of rotation cannot be arbitrary but can only take the following fractions of 2*pi: THETA= 2*pi/n where n = 1,2,3,4,6"

The Attempt at a Solution



So, the problem states that C5 is a group, mathematically, but just not a crystal point group. But obviously, C5 is also a point symmetry, since the point at the rotation axis is invariant. So the only thing I can think of is saying "by definition," because of the undemonstrated statement given by 2) above.

I have no idea how to proceed. I mean, it's a group. It's a point symmetry. If that's all I know, it should be a point group. Why isn't it a crystal point group? My book never explains what technical meaning modifying a phrase by "crystal" would yield.

Any hints would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A point symmetry must not only fix one of the points, but must also be a symmetry of the overall structure. So consider a hexagon with a point at its center - this gives 7 points. Then rotating by 1/5 of a rotation CCW about the center point fixes the center point, but doesn't send the set of vertices to the set of vertices. On the other hand, if you rotate by 1/6 of a rotation CCW about the center, then the center is fixed, and the vertices get sent to the vertices (in particular, each vertex gets sent to the "next" one that's adjacent to it in the CCW direction) [CCW = counter-clockwise].
 
Thanks AKG,

I think I see what you are saying. Would it also be correct to say that C5 would imply a pentagonal crystal system, which is not possible?
 
Yeah, that's correct.
 
Great. Thanks again.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top