Show exp(A) is invertible for a matrix A

  • Thread starter Thread starter chipotleaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the invertibility of the matrix exponential defined as e^A for a matrix A, where A is an n x n matrix satisfying A^{2013} = 0. Participants are tasked with finding an expression for the inverse of e^A in terms of A.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants consider whether demonstrating the invertibility of the function e^x for real numbers can be applied to the matrix case. Others suggest exploring the properties of the matrix exponential through the binomial theorem and its implications for matrices with nilpotent characteristics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various approaches to establish the invertibility of e^A. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of specific properties of matrices, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint that A is a nilpotent matrix, specifically that A^{2013} = 0, which may influence their reasoning and approaches to the problem.

chipotleaway
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Define e^A=I_n+A+\frac{1}{2!}A^2+\frac{1}{3!}A^3+...+\frac{1}{2012!}A2012
where A is an nxn matrix such that A^{2013}=0. Show that e^A is invertible and find an expression for (e^A)^{-1} in terms of A.

The Attempt at a Solution



To first show that it's invertible, can I just show the function e^x has an inverse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chipotleaway said:

Homework Statement



Define e^A=I_n+A+\frac{1}{2!}A^2+\frac{1}{3!}A^3+...+\frac{1}{2012!}A2012
where A is an nxn matrix such that A^{2013}=0. Show that e^A is invertible and find an expression for (e^A)^{-1} in terms of A.

The Attempt at a Solution



To first show that it's invertible, can I just show the function e^x has an inverse?

Where x is a real number? That would work fine if A were diagonal. I don't think assuming ##A^{2013}=0## makes it any easier. I would just try to show ##e^{sA}e^{tA}=e^{(s+t)A}## first. It's really just the binomial theorem. Then put s=1 and t=(-1).
 
Do you know that x^n- 1= (x- 1)(1+ x+ x^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x^{n-1})?

If not try proving it by induction on n. Notice that proof works for matrices as well as numbers.
 
Try it first for a matrix B with B^4 = 0 (to make the problem smaller): if you can do it with one where you can see all the terms in the sum and see what happens, writing down the work for your case will just require a little careful writing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K