Show Rationals and Integers are not Isomorphic

  • Thread starter miqbal
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integers
In summary, the conversation discusses ways to show that the groups Q and R are not isomorphic under addition. The first solution mentioned using generators and cyclic groups, but it was not covered in class yet. The second solution involves proving that there is no homomorphic map from the rationals to the integers that is also bijective, thus showing that Q and R are not isomorphic. This is done by considering the mapping of a rational number to an integer and showing that it leads to a contradiction.
  • #1
miqbal
28
0

Homework Statement


Show that the groups [tex]\textbf{Q}[/tex] and [tex]\textbf{R}[/tex] are not isomorphic (both under addition).

This was already answered before https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=294687", but using different theory (generators and cyclic groups). We haven't covered that stuff in class yet. See below.

Homework Equations


Two groups, G and H, are NOT isomorphic if:
1) |G| [tex]\neq[/tex] |H|
2) Let [tex]\varphi[/tex] be a map from G to H. Then G, H are not isomorphic if for some [tex]x \in \textbf{G}, |x| \neq |\varphi(x)|[/tex]
3) G is abelian, H is not abelian or vice versa.

Two groups are isomorphic iff there exists [tex]\varphi:\textbf{G} \rightarrow \textbf{H} [/tex] s.t:
1) [tex]\varphi[/tex] is a homomorphism.
2) [tex]\varphi[/tex] is a bijection.

Homomorphism:
[tex]\varphi(xy) = \varphi(x)\varphi(y)[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution


I know it is possible to set up a bijection from Z to Q because Q is countable (isomorphic to N) and so is Z. Then the solution must be that no homomorphism exists from Z to Q.

Proof
p,q are rational. p < q. a,b are integers. [tex]\varphi:{\bftext{Q} \rightarrow \bftext{R}[/tex], assume it is a homomorphism.
If [tex]\varphi(p)=a, \varphi(q) = b[/tex], then [tex]\varphi(p + q)=\varphi(p)+\varphi(q) = a + b[/tex]. But consider p + (q - p)/2. This must map to an integer in between a and b. Why? (I'm not sure, i'll have to investigate this rigorously). Since there are finitely many integers between a and b, but infinitely many rationals between p and q, [tex]\varphi[/tex] cannot be bijective. Which means that there is no homomorphic map from the rationals to the integers that is also bijective. So Q cannot be isomorphic to R.

Is this sufficient?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's a little sketchy. Let f be an isomorphism Q->Z. Let p=f^(-1)(1). Then what is f(p/2)? It must be an integer that when added to itself gives 1.
 
  • #3
Yeah got it.

If [tex]f^{-1}(1) = p[/tex], then [tex]\varphi(\frac{p}{2}+\frac{p}{2})=1[/tex] but that implies [tex]0<\varphi(\frac{p}{2})<1[/tex] which is impossible since no integer exists between 0 and 1.

Thanks man.
 

1. What are rationals and integers?

Rationals and integers are types of numbers that fall under the category of "real numbers". Integers are whole numbers, both positive and negative, including zero. Rationals are numbers that can be written as a fraction, with a non-zero integer as the numerator and a non-zero integer as the denominator.

2. What does it mean for two sets to be isomorphic?

Two sets are isomorphic if they have the same structure, meaning that there is a one-to-one correspondence between their elements. This means that every element in one set has a unique counterpart in the other set, and vice versa. In other words, the two sets are essentially "the same" in terms of their elements, even if the elements themselves may be different.

3. Can you give an example of how rationals and integers are not isomorphic?

Yes, consider the sets of positive integers and positive rationals. While both sets are infinite and have the same cardinality (meaning they have the same number of elements), they are not isomorphic. This is because the structure of these two sets is different - the positive integers are a subset of the positive rationals, but every positive rational number cannot be written as a positive integer.

4. How is the isomorphism between sets of numbers related to their properties?

The isomorphism between sets of numbers is related to their properties because properties are based on the structure of the sets. If two sets are isomorphic, they have the same structure and therefore the same properties. If two sets are not isomorphic, they have different structures and may have different properties.

5. Why is it important to understand that rationals and integers are not isomorphic?

Understanding that rationals and integers are not isomorphic is important because it helps us to better understand the fundamental properties of these two types of numbers. It also allows us to make important mathematical distinctions between the two sets and prevents us from making incorrect assumptions or conclusions based on their isomorphic relationship.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
990
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
805
Replies
6
Views
945
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
480
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
752
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top