Show something's a homomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the map from the group G, defined as G -> H, where G consists of elements exp(i*theta) and H consists of elements exp(im*theta), is a group homomorphism if and only if m is an integer. The proof involves showing that for any elements exp(ix) and exp(iy) in G, the homomorphic property holds true only when m is an integer, as fractional powers lead to ambiguities in the definition of roots. The participants clarify that if m is not an integer, raising elements to the power of m does not yield consistent results, particularly when considering the square root of -1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their exponential forms
  • Knowledge of properties of integer and fractional powers
  • Basic grasp of the unit circle in the complex plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group homomorphisms in abstract algebra
  • Explore the implications of fractional powers in complex analysis
  • Learn about the unit circle and its significance in complex number theory
  • Investigate examples of homomorphisms in different algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of group homomorphisms and complex number theory.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2
LetH= {expim*theta; theta in R}. Show thatthe map G -> H, exp(i*theta) |-> exp(im*theta) is a group homomorphismi if and only if m is an integer.

(=>) Assume G - > is a group homo s.t. phi(exp(I*theta)) = (exp(I*m*theta))

Consider exp(ix), exp(iy) in G

Since G is a homo,

phi(exp(ix)exp(iy)) = phi(exp(ix))phi(exp(iy)))
phi(exp(i(x+y))) = phi(exp(ix))phi(exp(iy)))
exp(im(x+y) =exp(imx)exp(imy)

Isthe m on the left equal to the m on the right? I don't think so, what's wrong here?

How do I show the converse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you've written it the m's must be the same. There is only one m kicking about the place.

You're attempting to show that raising z to z^m is a group homomorphism if and only if m is an integer (z in the complex circle |z|=1).

One way is obvious, and strangely it's the way you've not addressed: (wz)^m=w^mz^m 1^m=1 (if m is an integer, if it isn't then raising things to the fractional powers isn't necessarily well defined is it? i.e. do we pick 1 or -1 as the square root of 1? Hey, perhaps that idea will help with the other direction...)

So, for the direction you were writing. -1 is exp(1pi), -1 squared is 1, if m were 1/2, then (-1)^1/2 would'n't square to 1, would it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K