Show that a sample space is valid by verifying properties

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying properties of a sample space in probability, specifically focusing on parts of a problem that involve understanding probability measures and their properties related to disjoint events and sums over defined sets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of certain parts of the problem, particularly parts b) and d). There are attempts to clarify the requirements for a probability space and how to correctly apply the definitions and properties involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided suggestions for improving the original poster's attempts, particularly regarding the notation and the need to clarify the definitions of sets involved. There is ongoing exploration of how to approach specific parts of the problem, with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions of sets and the implications of splitting sums, as well as the need for careful attention to symbols in mathematical expressions. Participants are also questioning the completeness of the original poster's understanding of the problem requirements.

a255c
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://puu.sh/nYQqE/2b0eaf2720.png

Homework Equations


http://puu.sh/nYSjQ/e48cad3a8b.png

The Attempt at a Solution


http://puu.sh/nYYjW/174ad8267c.png

My main issue is with part b) and part d). I think that part b) is mostly right, but part d) is definitely wrong and incomplete, and I have no idea how to do it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
a255c said:
part d) is definitely wrong and incomplete, and I have no idea how to do it.
(d) is not too bad. The suggestions I would make are:
- in iii you need to state that A and B are disjoint, otherwise the equalities will not hold. Also the first ##Pr## should be ##Pr'##. You need to be careful with your symbols in a problem like this, as misplaced or wrong symbols lead to confusion.
- in ii, the statement ##\sum_{i\in S}\frac{n_i}{36}## should be ##\sum_{i\in S'}\frac{n_i}{36}## (care with symbols again). You'll probably find it easier if you split it into two sums ##\sum_{i=2}^6## and ##\sum_{i=7}^{12}##. Then use the above definitions of ##n_i## in terms of ##i##.
- the proof that ##P(\emptyset)=0## is not correct because dice have nothing to do with it. What is ##\sum_{i\in\emptyset}\frac{n_i}{36}## (how many terms are there in the sum?)?
 
Last edited:
andrewkirk said:
(d) is not too bad. The suggestions I would make are:
- in iii you need to state that A and B are disjoint, otherwise the equalities will not hold. Also the first ##Pr## should be ##Pr'##. You need to be careful with your symbols in a problem like this, as misplaced or wrong symbols lead to confusion.
- in ii, the statement ##\sum_{i\in S}\frac{n_i}{36}## should be ##\sum_{i\in S'}\frac{n_i}{36}## (care with symbols again). You'll probably find it easier if you split it into two sums ##\sum{i=2}^6## and ##\sum{i=7}^12##. Then use the above definitions of ##n_i## in terms of ##i##.
- the proof that ##P(\emptyset)=0## is not correct because dice have nothing to do with it. What is ##\sum_{i\in\emptyset}\frac{n_i}{36}## (how many terms are there in the sum?)?

I have used your suggestions and have fixed my answers to this:
http://puu.sh/nZZZl/d243480f50.png

but I did not know what you mean about splitting the sums for d)ii, and I'm still unsure how to do d)i
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What are you trying to prove in (d)(i)? I think all the requirements of a probability space are contained in (d)ii and iii.

For splitting sums, replace ##\sum_{j\in S'}## by ##\sum_{j=2}^6+\sum_{j=7}^{12}## (I prefer to use ##j## rather than ##i## as an index variable because MathJax insists on inappropriately autocorrecting ##i## to ##I##).
 
andrewkirk said:
What are you trying to prove in (d)(i)? I think all the requirements of a probability space are contained in (d)ii and iii.

For splitting sums, replace ##\sum_{j\in S'}## by ##\sum_{j=2}^6+\sum_{j=7}^{12}## (I prefer to use ##j## rather than ##i## as an index variable because MathJax insists on inappropriately autocorrecting ##i## to ##I##).

I'm trying to prove property 1 for d)i.

I don't really understand how you get j = 2 and j = 7 though for the sums or where you get the two sums from to begin with.
 
a255c said:
where you get the two sums from to begin with.
You started with ##\sum_{j\in S'}##
What is ##S'##?
I'm trying to prove property 1 for d)i.
Assuming you prove ##Pr(S')=1## in ii, you just have to prove that ##A\subseteq S'\Rightarrow Pr(A)\leq Pr(S')##. Try splitting ##S'## into ##A## and ##S'-A##.
 
andrewkirk said:
You started with ##\sum_{j\in S'}##
What is ##S'##?

Assuming you prove ##Pr(S')=1## in ii, you just have to prove that ##A\subseteq S'\Rightarrow Pr(A)\leq Pr(S')##. Try splitting ##S'## into ##A## and ##S'-A##.
S' is 36, but I still don't understand how you got 2 and 7 specifically..

If I split S' into A and S'-A, then I say something like \sum{i \in A} + \sum{i\in S'-A} = \sum{i \in S}?
I'm not sure how splitting could help me for part d)i.
 
a255c said:
S' is 36
No it isn't. Look at the OP where ##S'## is defined.
 
andrewkirk said:
No it isn't. Look at the OP where ##S'## is defined.
Oh, i see what you are saying. So then I evaluate for n_j/36 for the two sums?

I did 2(1+2+3+4+5+6+7)/36 but this does not equal 1

I have modified my answers to this
http://puu.sh/o111N/1376d907c3.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
a255c said:
I did 2(1+2+3+4+5+6+7)/36 but this does not equal 1
That sum has fourteen terms (2 x 7). How many terms are there supposed to be in the sum?
 
  • #11
andrewkirk said:
That sum has fourteen terms (2 x 7). How many terms are there supposed to be in the sum?
10...

so it's 2(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5)/36? That's 30/36 though
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K