Show that a set of vectors spans a subspace

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set of vectors {(1, 2, 3), (3, 4, 5), (4, 5, 6)} does not span R3, as demonstrated by the calculation of the rank of matrix A = [1 3 4; 2 4 5; 3 5 6], which yields rank(A) = 2, indicating it cannot span a three-dimensional space. However, these vectors do span the subspace defined by the plane equation x - 2y + z = 0. By expressing an arbitrary vector in the plane as a linear combination of the given vectors, explicit coefficients can be derived to confirm this span.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically vector spaces and spans.
  • Familiarity with matrix operations, including row-echelon form and rank determination.
  • Knowledge of linear combinations and how to express vectors in terms of other vectors.
  • Ability to manipulate equations of planes in three-dimensional space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of finding the rank of a matrix using Gaussian elimination.
  • Learn how to express vectors as linear combinations of other vectors in vector spaces.
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of spans and subspaces in linear algebra.
  • Investigate methods for solving systems of linear equations related to vector spans.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians interested in vector spaces, and anyone seeking to understand the concepts of spans and subspaces in R3.

mattqchou
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that {(1, 2, 3), (3, 4, 5), (4, 5, 6)} does not span R3. Show that it spans the subspace of R3 consisting of all vectors lying in the plane with the equation x - 2y + z = 0.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I made a matrix of:
A = [ 1 3 4 ; 2 4 5; 3 5 6] and reduced it to row-echelon form to determine rank. I found that rank(A) = 2. Therefore, it can't span R3, since rank(A) < n for Rn.

But then I need to show that it spans the plane given by the equation x - 2y + z = 0.

I thought that perhaps rewriting the problem as: z = -x + 2y and plugging back in for z. But that doesn't really tell me anything.

I also tried to show the span by demonstrating where it has linear combinations by writing span(F) = span{ax - 2by + cz = 0} but I don't know what to do from here.

I was able to find the solution in the solutions manual, but I can't decipher what it's saying or how it did it. It's not using a method described in the book.

lateximg_large.png


Could someone explain this better or give me another method to figure out whether a set spans a subspace?
 

Attachments

  • lateximg_large.png
    lateximg_large.png
    45 KB · Views: 2,598
Physics news on Phys.org
They find explicit coefficients for the vectors (1,2,3) and (3,4,5) to express every vector in the plane as linear combination of these vectors.
The coefficients are (-2x+3y/2) and (x-y/2). Multiply them with the vectors, simplify and you get a general vector in the discussed plane.
 
mfb said:
They find explicit coefficients for the vectors (1,2,3) and (3,4,5) to express every vector in the plane as linear combination of these vectors.
The coefficients are (-2x+3y/2) and (x-y/2). Multiply them with the vectors, simplify and you get a general vector in the discussed plane.
Hi,

Could you explain how you find explicit coefficients? I've never heard of this method in my class before. I also can't find that in the book or the glossary.

Thanks!
 
See the calculation above, it does exactly this.
It starts with an arbitrary vector in the plane and assumes that it can be written as ##\alpha (1,2,3) + \beta (3,4,5)## and then solves for the two unknowns.
 
mattqchou said:
But then I need to show that it spans the plane given by the equation x - 2y + z = 0.

I thought that perhaps rewriting the problem as: z = -x + 2y and plugging back in for z. But that doesn't really tell me anything.
Sure it does. You now have three equations that describe the vectors that lie in that plane:
\begin{align*}
x &= s \\
y &= t \\
z &= -s + 2t
\end{align*} or in vector form,
$$\begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \\ z \end{pmatrix} = s\begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ -1\end{pmatrix} + t\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}.$$ Can you take it from there?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K