Show that radial worldlines with u = const are outgoing null rays

  • Thread starter Thread starter so_gr_lo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radial
AI Thread Summary
Radial worldlines with constant u represent outgoing null rays in the context of Schwarzschild coordinates. By rearranging the differential for dt and substituting it into the line element, the outgoing Eddington-Finkelstein form is derived. This form shows that constant u and radial motion yield a line element where ds^2 equals zero, confirming the null nature of the geodesics. In Regge-Wheeler coordinates, radial null geodesics satisfy the condition dt/dr* = ±1, with the outgoing solution corresponding to u being constant. Thus, the discussion establishes that these worldlines indeed represent outgoing null rays.
so_gr_lo
Messages
69
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
The transformation from Schwarzschild coordinates (t,r,θ,φ) to outgoing Eddington– Finkelstein coordinates (u, r′, θ′, φ′) is given by
u = t−r∗
r′ = r
θ′ = θ
φ′ = φ,
where r∗ satisfies dr∗/dr = (1−2M/r)−1. Use the rule for the coordinate transformation
of metric components to obtain the line element in the (u, r′, θ′, φ′) coordinates.

(b) Show that radial worldlines with u = const are outgoing null rays.

I have managed part a but am not sure how to show how the line element I have is null.

I have used the fact that u = t−r∗ suggests du=0 and ## d{\Omega}^2## = 0 to simplify the line element in (a) and give the result below. Does anyone know how I can show that the result is null?
Relevant Equations
u = t−r∗
r∗ satisfies dr∗/dr = (1−2M/r)−1
$$ ds^2 = -(1-\frac{2M}{r'})(\frac{\frac{r'}{2M} -1+2M}{\frac{r'}{2M}-1})(dr')^2+(1-\frac{2M}{r'})^-1 (dr')^2 $$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With ##u = t-r_{\star}## you have $$du = dt - \frac{dr}{(1-\tfrac{2M}{r})}$$You rearrange this for ##dt## and stick that into the line element in Schwarzshild coordinates. You end up with the outgoing Eddington Finkelstein line element,$$ds^2 = -(1-\tfrac{2M}{r}) du^2 - 2du dr + r^2 d\Omega^2$$Manifestly, constant ##u## (##du = 0##) and radial motion (##d\theta = d\phi = 0##) corresponds to ##ds^2 = 0##.

Why outgoing? In terms of the Regge-Wheeler coordinate, the line element is ##ds^2 = -(1-\tfrac{2M}{r})[-dt^2 + dr_{\star}^2] + r^2 d\Omega^2##. That means radial null geodesics correspond to ##dt/dr_{\star} = \pm 1##, or equivalently ##t \mp r_{\star} = \mathrm{const}## along radial null geodesics. The minus-sign option is outgoing, i.e. ##u := t-r_{\star} = \mathrm{const}## along the outgoing radial null geodesics.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top