Show that radial worldlines with u = const are outgoing null rays

  • Thread starter Thread starter so_gr_lo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radial
so_gr_lo
Messages
69
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
The transformation from Schwarzschild coordinates (t,r,θ,φ) to outgoing Eddington– Finkelstein coordinates (u, r′, θ′, φ′) is given by
u = t−r∗
r′ = r
θ′ = θ
φ′ = φ,
where r∗ satisfies dr∗/dr = (1−2M/r)−1. Use the rule for the coordinate transformation
of metric components to obtain the line element in the (u, r′, θ′, φ′) coordinates.

(b) Show that radial worldlines with u = const are outgoing null rays.

I have managed part a but am not sure how to show how the line element I have is null.

I have used the fact that u = t−r∗ suggests du=0 and ## d{\Omega}^2## = 0 to simplify the line element in (a) and give the result below. Does anyone know how I can show that the result is null?
Relevant Equations
u = t−r∗
r∗ satisfies dr∗/dr = (1−2M/r)−1
$$ ds^2 = -(1-\frac{2M}{r'})(\frac{\frac{r'}{2M} -1+2M}{\frac{r'}{2M}-1})(dr')^2+(1-\frac{2M}{r'})^-1 (dr')^2 $$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With ##u = t-r_{\star}## you have $$du = dt - \frac{dr}{(1-\tfrac{2M}{r})}$$You rearrange this for ##dt## and stick that into the line element in Schwarzshild coordinates. You end up with the outgoing Eddington Finkelstein line element,$$ds^2 = -(1-\tfrac{2M}{r}) du^2 - 2du dr + r^2 d\Omega^2$$Manifestly, constant ##u## (##du = 0##) and radial motion (##d\theta = d\phi = 0##) corresponds to ##ds^2 = 0##.

Why outgoing? In terms of the Regge-Wheeler coordinate, the line element is ##ds^2 = -(1-\tfrac{2M}{r})[-dt^2 + dr_{\star}^2] + r^2 d\Omega^2##. That means radial null geodesics correspond to ##dt/dr_{\star} = \pm 1##, or equivalently ##t \mp r_{\star} = \mathrm{const}## along radial null geodesics. The minus-sign option is outgoing, i.e. ##u := t-r_{\star} = \mathrm{const}## along the outgoing radial null geodesics.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top