Show that the function satisfies the Schrodinger eqaution

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 1K views
pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I am quite new to quantum mechanics and i am self teaching through a book called "Quantum mechanics for applied physics and engineering" by Albert Thomas Fromhold Jr. There are no solutions to the exercises, I am im not sure how to begin with these types of questions since they are new to me.

Quantum mechanics Qns.PNG

Homework Equations



1) Time dependent one-dimensional S.W.E
2) Time dependent one-dimensional S.W.E with potential function

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start for the first, i could try differentiating it, but I am not sure how, maybe the fundamental theorem of calculus ?

As for the second, I know i need to include a potential function for gravity which I am guessing would be of the form GMm/r^2 in the unit x direction...

Thanks for any pointers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first, you should use the Leibniz integral rule.
And for the second, there are 2 problems with what you suggest:
1) The inverse square law is for the force, not for the potential.
2) The potential should be an accordance with the force. The potential 1/r is for the inverse square force. The uniform field of the question has a linear potential. In fact the potential is derived from [itex]V=-\int_{r_{ref}}^r \vec g \cdot \vec{dr}[/itex].
 
Hi Shyan, thank you for the reply.

I have tried to apply Leibniz's Integral rule as you suggested and have run into what seems a dead end;

## \psi_{xx}(x,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-k^2A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk##

## \psi_{t}(x,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-i\omega A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk##

When I sub both of these into the one dimensional time dependent Schrödinger equation,##\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\psi_{xx}=i\hbar\psi_{t}##, I get;

## \frac{\hbar}{2m}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}-k^2A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\omega A(k)e^{i(kx-wt)}dk##

I do not know where to proceed from here, I can't figure out how to make the integrals on either side of the equality look like each other (so i can cancel them) since i can't take k or ##\omega## out of the integral. I tried to use that k=w/v where v is velocity but to no avail. Another pointer would be greatly appreciated!

For part two, would the potential function be; ##V(x)=\frac{-GMm}{x}## ? Also can i assume that it is a one dimensional case, I suspect i can't since the hint involved the unit vector in the x direction, which seems to imply 3 dimensional space?
 
Your wave-function is the superposition of plane waves of all possible wave-numvers(Lets call them modes). Now for each mode([itex]\varphi_k(x)[/itex]), we know that its energy is only kinetic and so we have [itex]\hat H \varphi_k(x)=\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}\varphi_k(x)[/itex]. We also know that [itex]i\hbar \partial_t \varphi_k(x)=\hbar \omega \varphi_k(x)[/itex]. So from Schrödinger equation, we have [itex]\hbar \omega=\frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}[/itex].
I told you about part two, but looks like you didn't pay attention. [itex]V(x)=-\int_{x_0}^x g \hat x \cdot \vec {dx'}=-\int_{x_0}^x g \hat x \cdot \hat x dx'=-\int_{x_0}^x g dx'=-g(x-x_0)[/itex], where [itex]x_0[/itex] is the origin of the potential which is arbitrary.
 
I am not familiar with the notation ##\hat H##, does it represent the total energy of the system? I have not learned about Hamiltonians yet, would you recommend that i do so before I learn QM? I think the book I am reading will introduce it soon though...
I did manage to get it to ##\omega=\frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}## but i couldn't see how this confirmed it is a valid solution. I'm obviously missing something quite important.
 
You should know what is a Hamiltonian so study about it. Anyway, [itex]\hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + V(x)[/itex](for one particle in 1D). But because in the first exercise, V(x)=0, we have [itex]\hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}[/itex].
Just take the integrals to the same side and factor [itex]A(k) e^{i(kx-\omega t)} dk[/itex].