Show that this is less than that

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArcanaNoir
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
ArcanaNoir
Messages
778
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


I would like to prove that when x is between 1 and 2 [tex]\frac{k^{0.5}x^x}{1+x^{2k}} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{x-1}}[/tex] for all [itex]k\in \mathbb{N}[/itex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This is for my analysis class. I am algebraist, so please take pity :)
I have learned that if I were to show that the numerator of the first fraction is less than the numerator of the second and the denominator of the first fraction is greater than the denominator of the second then the first fraction would be smaller than the second. That technique doesn't seem to be working though. If the second fraction needs tweaking to make this work then that is fine. I'm just trying to bound the first fraction with something integrable. I think my bound works based on Maple graphs.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LCKurtz said:
Does the bound have to be independent of ##k##?

Yes it does.
 
Can't be true, if I let k-> inf surely it will not be valid.
 
dirk_mec1 said:
Can't be true, if I let k-> inf surely it will not be valid.

alas! you may be right. I have just received word that a classmate may have a proof that the sequence cannot be bounded by an integrable function.
 
Yes you're right. Then how will the proof read?
 
ArcanaNoir said:

Homework Statement


I would like to prove that when x is between 1 and 2 [tex]\frac{k^{0.5}x^x}{1+x^{2k}} < \frac{1}{\sqrt{x-1}}[/tex] for all [itex]k\in \mathbb{N}[/itex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



This is for my analysis class. I am algebraist, so please take pity :)
I have learned that if I were to show that the numerator of the first fraction is less than the numerator of the second and the denominator of the first fraction is greater than the denominator of the second then the first fraction would be smaller than the second. That technique doesn't seem to be working though. If the second fraction needs tweaking to make this work then that is fine. I'm just trying to bound the first fraction with something integrable. I think my bound works based on Maple graphs.

Here's a possible outline of a proof.

Take the natural logarithm of the left hand side.
\begin{aligned}\ln \frac{k^{0.5}x^x}{1+x^{2k}}
&= 0.5\ln k + x\ln x - \ln(1+x^{2k}) \\
&< 0.5\ln k + x\ln x - \ln(x^{2k}) \\
&= 0.5\ln k + x\ln x - 2k \ln x
\end{aligned}
Find the maximum value of this last expression with respect to ##k##, treating it as a real number.
The result is ##k=1/\ln x## with the maximum ##\frac 1 2 \ln(1/\ln x) - 1##.

Therefore an upper bound of the original left hand side is:
$$\frac 1 {e\sqrt{\ln x}}$$

What is left is the proof that this is less than the right hand side.
Substitute ##x=u+1## and make a first order Taylor expansion of ##\ln##.

And... we're done. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you so much ILS. This analysis makes me want to cry!