HF08
- 39
- 0
Let a,b[tex]\in[/tex]R[tex]^{m}[/tex], b[tex]\neq[/tex]0 and set [tex]\phi[/tex](t)=a+tb.
We must show that the angle between [tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{1}[/tex])-[tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{0}[/tex]) and [tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{2}[/tex])-[tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{0}[/tex])
is 0 or [tex]\pi[/tex] for any t[tex]_{0}[/tex],t[tex]_{1}[/tex],t[tex]_{2}[/tex],[tex]\in[/tex]R with t[tex]_{1}[/tex],t[tex]_{2}[/tex][tex]\neq[/tex].
The 0,1, and 2 are supposed to be subscripts next to t, but my Latex is showing is as superscripts? I don't know why.
Here is my work:
I don't know where to start. My guess is we start with [tex]\phi[/tex](t)=a+tb. Do we use the law of cosines? How can I even begin to show what looks like arbitrary definitions, arbitrary values and show either 0 or [tex]\pi[/tex]? Please
help me. It isn't lack of trying, I need to attack this problem, but I feel more like I am drowning.
Thank You,
HF08
We must show that the angle between [tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{1}[/tex])-[tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{0}[/tex]) and [tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{2}[/tex])-[tex]\phi[/tex](t[tex]_{0}[/tex])
is 0 or [tex]\pi[/tex] for any t[tex]_{0}[/tex],t[tex]_{1}[/tex],t[tex]_{2}[/tex],[tex]\in[/tex]R with t[tex]_{1}[/tex],t[tex]_{2}[/tex][tex]\neq[/tex].
The 0,1, and 2 are supposed to be subscripts next to t, but my Latex is showing is as superscripts? I don't know why.
Here is my work:
I don't know where to start. My guess is we start with [tex]\phi[/tex](t)=a+tb. Do we use the law of cosines? How can I even begin to show what looks like arbitrary definitions, arbitrary values and show either 0 or [tex]\pi[/tex]? Please
help me. It isn't lack of trying, I need to attack this problem, but I feel more like I am drowning.
Thank You,
HF08