Show the proof by induction in the given problem

In summary, by adding the next term in the series, we can express the sum of cubes up to ##k+1## as the sum of cubes up to ##k## plus the cube of the next integer. This allows us to easily find a closed form expression for the sum of cubes.
  • #1
chwala
Gold Member
2,650
351
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
Induction
My interest is solely on the highlighted part in red...hmmmmmmm :cool: taken a bit of my time to figure that out...but i got it. Looking for any other way of looking at it;
1671751315037.png

I just realised that the next term would be given by;

##\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2(k+2)^2-\dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2##

##=\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2\left[(k+2)^2-k^2\right]##

##=\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2\left[k^2+4k+4-k^2\right]##

##=\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2\left[4k+4\right]##

Therefore adding the ##k## to ##k+1## yields;

##\dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2+ \dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2\left[4k+4\right]##

##=\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2\left[k^2+4k+4\right]##

Then the rest of the step will follow...this was the only challenging part...any other way of looking at it would be nice. Cheers

Question
If i may ask, how did they get the ##(k+1)^3## on the first line?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The line in red is just factoring ##\frac{1}{4}(k+1)^2##. The left term leaves a ##k^2##, the right term leaves a ##4(k+1)## which is less visually obvious because factoring fractions is tricky. You can avoid needing to notice clever manipulations. You can just totally expand the expression into a polynomial, and then take your target expression and expand it into a polynomial, and confirm the coefficients line up.
 
  • #3
chwala said:
Question
If i may ask, how did they get the ##(k+1)^3## on the first line?

Where on the first line?
 
  • #4
malawi_glenn said:
Where on the first line?
On this line;

##\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3= \dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2 +(k+1)^3##
 
  • #5
chwala said:
On this line;

##\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3= \dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2 +(k+1)^3##

Hint, what can ## \displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^{k} r^3 + (k+1)^3## be written as?
1671775584336.png

what do you think "adding the next term" mean?
 
  • #6
malawi_glenn said:
Hint, what can ## \displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^{k} r^3 + (k+1)^3## be written as?
View attachment 319251
what do you think "adding the next term" mean?

Seen it...you can check post ##1## and see that i know what 'the next term is'...therefore i will just go ahead and add it to previous term as follows;

##\dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2+\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2\left[4k+4\right]##

##\dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2+4\left[\dfrac{1}{4}(k+1)^2(k+1)\right]##

##=\dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2+(k+1)^2 (k+1)##

##\dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2+(k+1)^3##

Cheers man!
 
Last edited:
  • #7
chwala said:
Cheers man!
It means this
## \displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^{k} r^3 + (k+1)^3 = 1 + 2^3 + 3^3 + \cdots + (k-1)^3 + k^3 + (k+1)^3 = \sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3 ##.
Thus, we can write
## \displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3 = \sum_{r=1}^{k } r^3 + (k+1)^3 = \dfrac{1}{4}k^2(k+1)^2 + (k+1)^3 ##
where we used the induction hypothesis in the last step.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeroK and chwala

1. What is induction in the context of a scientific problem?

Induction is a method of mathematical proof where a statement is shown to be true for a specific number of cases, and then it is assumed to be true for all cases. This allows for a simpler and more efficient way to prove a statement.

2. How does one use induction to prove a statement?

To use induction, one must first prove that the statement is true for the base case, usually the smallest or simplest case. Then, assuming the statement is true for a specific case, the statement must be proven for the next case. This process is repeated until the statement is proven for all cases.

3. What are the benefits of using induction in a scientific problem?

Using induction allows for a more concise and efficient way to prove a statement, as it eliminates the need to prove the statement for every single case. It also allows for a better understanding of patterns and relationships within the problem.

4. Can induction be used to prove any statement?

No, induction can only be used to prove statements that follow a specific pattern or relationship. It cannot be used to prove statements that do not have a predictable pattern.

5. Are there any limitations to using induction in scientific problems?

One limitation of using induction is that it can only prove a statement to be true, it cannot prove a statement to be false. Additionally, if the base case or the assumption for a specific case is incorrect, the entire proof will be invalid.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
255
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
720
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
736
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
983
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
759
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
448
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
817
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
491
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top