Showing a sequence is bounded and convergent to its infimum.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that any non-increasing sequence that is bounded from below converges to its infimum. The participants are exploring the properties of monotonic sequences and the implications of being bounded below.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the definition of non-increasing sequences and their relationship to monotonicity. Others question the existence of a greatest lower bound for such sequences and how this relates to convergence. There is also inquiry into the definition of convergence itself.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the properties of the sequence and raising questions about theorems related to greatest lower bounds. There is recognition of the need to establish the convergence to the infimum, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and properties of sequences, particularly focusing on the implications of being bounded below and non-increasing. There is uncertainty regarding the application of relevant theorems and definitions in the context of convergence.

ryanj123
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that any non-increasing bounded from below sequence is convergent to its
infimum.


Homework Equations



Not quite sure... is this a monotonic sequence?

The Attempt at a Solution



At this point I'm not even sure about which route to go. I am in need of serious help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
say your sequence is {xi}

non-increasing means
xi - xj <0 for all i>j
which is monotonic

bounded from below means
there exists a lower bound a, such that for all i, xi > a

do you have a theorem about a greatest lower bound existing for bounded below sequence? Otherwise you may have to show this exists, then use the monotnic behaviour of the function to show it converges to the glb{xi) (=inf{xi})
 
Last edited:
lanedance said:
say your sequence is {xi}

non-increasing means
xi - xj <0 for all i>j
which is monotonic

bounded from below means
there exists a lower bound a, such that for all i, xi > a

do you have a theorem about a greatest lower bound existing for bounded below sequence? Otherwise you may have to show this exists, then use the monotnic behaviour of the function to show it converges to the glb{xi) (=inf{xi})

Are you speaking of the infimum thm.? I know of that. But it's showing the convergence to it that is the problem for me...
 
so as the sequence is bounded below, you know it has a glb = inf{xi}

by definition of infinium

say X = {xi}
a = inf{xi}

then for any xi in X , then there exists xj in X such that
a < xj < xi

why? & how does it help...? ;)

what is your definition of convergence?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K