Showing an analytic function is identically zero

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dunkle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Zero
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if an analytic function f has a sequence of distinct zeros converging to a point r in its domain, then f must be identically zero in the connected component of the domain containing r. The user attempts to prove this by examining the case where r=0 and showing that the coefficients of the power series representation of f are all zero using induction on the derivatives. They successfully establish that f(0) and f'(0) are both zero, but struggle with the induction step for higher derivatives. Another participant suggests taking the limit of the derivatives using the sequence converging to zero, which leads to the conclusion that all derivatives must also be zero. This confirms that the function is identically zero in the specified domain.
Dunkle
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a claim from a Wikipedia page about analytic functions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_function), and I can't seem to prove it.

If (r_{n}) is a sequence of distinct numbers such that f(r_{n}) = 0 for all n and this sequence converges to a point r in the domain of D, then f is identically zero on the connected component of D containing r.

Homework Equations



f(x) = \sum a_{n}x^{n}

f(x_{n})=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to prove the case when r=0. If f is analytic, then it can be represented by some power series. If you look at some sequence (r_n) = 1/n, then the zeros of f bunch up near 0. It is clear to me that f(0)=0 (since f is continuous), so a_{0}=0. It is also clear to me that f '(0)=0, and so a_{1}=0. It seems like the way to go is to show (using induction) that each a_{n} is 0 by showing that all derivatives at 0 are equal to 0.

Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's correct. It follows from this that two analytic functions that have the same values in the r_n are identitical. Analytic continuation is thus unique.
 
I am having problems with the induction for the derivatives. I already showed f '(0)=0. Assuming

f^{(k)}(0)=0,

we need to show that

f^{(k+1)}(0)=0.

We compute

f^{(k+1)}(0)=\frac{f^{(k)}(x)-f^{(k)}(0)}{x-0}=\frac{f^{(k)}(x)}{x}

But I don't see why this is 0. Any suggestions?
 
You need to take limit of x to zero. You can compute that limit by taking for x the sequence of the rn that tend to zero and computing the lmit for n to infinity. For all n you have that:

\frac{f^{\left k\right)}\left(r_{n}\right)}{r_{n}}=0

So, the limit is clearly zero.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K