Showing elements in an extension field Z[sqrt(-5)] have gcd = 1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The elements 3 and 2+\sqrt{-5} in the ring \textbf{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] have a greatest common divisor (gcd) of 1, as both elements are irreducible in this ring. The ideal I = (3, 2+\sqrt{-5}) is not the total ring, which implies that it is not principal. This conclusion is reached by demonstrating that no integers a and b exist such that 1 can be expressed as a linear combination of 3 and 2+\sqrt{-5} within \textbf{Z}[\sqrt{-5}].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irreducibility in algebraic number theory
  • Familiarity with ideals in ring theory
  • Knowledge of norms in quadratic fields
  • Basic concepts of greatest common divisors in rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of irreducible elements in \textbf{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]
  • Learn about principal and non-principal ideals in algebraic number theory
  • Explore the concept of norms in quadratic fields and their implications
  • Investigate the relationship between gcd and ideals in various rings
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of algebraic number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of ideals and gcd in quadratic fields.

tomelwood
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the elements 3 and 2+\sqrt{-5} in \textbf{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] have a greatest common divisor of 1, but the ideal I = (3, 2+\sqrt{-5}) is not the total. Conclude that I is not principle.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have got as far as attempting to show the first part. If I show that both 3 and 2+\sqrt{-5} are both irreducible in \textbf{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] then they are relatively prime and hence have gcd of 1?
Also, the norms of both the numbers are 9, so does this do anything at all?
The way I have argued that both 3 and 2+\sqrt{-5} are irreducible is:
Let 3=ab with a and b in \textbf{Z}[\sqrt{-5}].
Now |a|^{2}*|b|^{2}=9 which has only 1,3,9 as positive factors.
If |a|^{2}=3 then a=x+y\sqrt{-5} with x,y satisfying x^{2}+5y^{2}=3.
There are no such integers, so |a|^{2}=/=3.
So either |a|=1 or |b| = 1. so either a or b is a unit, so 3 is irreducible.
Exactly the same for 2+\sqrt{-5} since 4+5=9, then argue the same way.

But I don't really know what to do from here,
And how do I argue that the Ideal is not the total?

As for the last statement, is it true that if an ideal of two coprime numbers is not the whole ring, then the ideal is not principal?

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To prove that the ideal is not the total ring. Proceed by contradiction: assume that there exists a,b\in \mathbb{Z}{\sqrt{-5}} such that

1=a.3+b.(2+\sqrt{-5})

Now try to reach a contradiction...
 
OK.
So letting a=x+y\sqrt{-5} and b=u+v\sqrt{-5}, x,y,u,v\in \textbf{Z}
we can multiply out your expression to give
1=3x+3y\sqrt{-5}+2u+u\sqrt{-5}+2v\sqrt{-5}-5v
Which can then be rearranged to give
x=\frac{(\sqrt{-5}(3y+u+2v)-1)}{3}
which means that x is something multiplied by the square root of minus 5, so cannot be an integer, as assumed.
I presume similar arguments can be made for y,u,v, meaning that we have our required contradiction?
 
So the definition of an ideal being the total ring is that multiplying the elements of the ideal by arbitrary elements of the ring gives 1?
Why is this?
Also, does my argument show that the greatest common divisor is 1? As I have shown (have I?) that they are both irreducible and so are both prime. And two prime numbers have gcd 1.

And then to finish off, I can just say that since an ideal of two elements with gcd 1 is not the whole ring, then the ideal is not principal? Is this true? Or do I need to prove something else in the meantime? If so, what?

Many thanks.
 
Tom! To prove that the gcd(2+\sqrt{-5})=1 you can use this:
divisors(3)=+-1,+-3. So you only have to try if those numbers divide 2+\sqrt{-5}.
Of course, the don't. Therefore gcd=1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K