Showing that Energy-momentum relation is invariant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the energy-momentum relation in the context of special relativity, specifically examining how energy and momentum transform between two frames of reference moving relative to each other. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that the relation \( (E')^2 - (p')^2c^2 = E^2 - p^2c^2 \) holds true despite the transformations of energy and momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the energy-momentum relation by manipulating algebraic expressions for energy and momentum in the moving frame. Some participants suggest using specific equations related to Lorentz transformations to facilitate the derivation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various approaches to the problem, with some providing guidance on how to express energy and momentum in terms of Lorentz factors. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the algebra involved, and the original poster expresses uncertainty about their progress.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the original poster's professor indicating that part (a) is necessary to derive part (b), which may impose a specific direction on the discussion. Additionally, the original poster notes a concern about how their expressions for energy and momentum will be perceived by their professor.

Rubber Ducky
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A particle of mass m is moving in the +x-direction with speed u and has momentum p and energy E in the frame S.

(a) If S' is moving at speed v, find the momentum p' and energy E' in the S' frame.
(b) Note that E' \neq E and p' \neq p, but show that (E')^2-(p')^2c^2=E^2-p^2c^2

Homework Equations


[/B]
E=p^2c^2+m^2c^4
E'=\gamma mc^2=\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(u')^2}{c^2}}}
p'=\gamma mu'=\frac{mu'}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(u')^2}{c^2}}}
u'=\frac{u-v}{1-\frac{uv}{c^2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



My prof says we need to use (a) to derive (b). It seems like it'd be easier a different way, but whatever. My strategy has been to show that (E')^2-(p')^2c^2=m^2c^4, which would complete the derivation.

I tried playing around with some algebra and got (E')^2=\frac{m^2c^4(c^2-uv)^2}{(c^2-u^2)(c^2-v^2)} and (p')^2=\frac{m^2(u-v)^2}{(1-\frac{uv}{c^2})^2(c^2-u^2)(c^2-v^2)}

I got a little overwhelmed with the algebra at this point. I'd like to know if this is right so far, at least, before trying anything else.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (a), you should be able to show that
\begin{eqnarray*}
E' &= \gamma(E - \beta pc) \\
p'c &= \gamma(pc - \beta E)
\end{eqnarray*} where ##\beta = v/c## and ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##.

Your expression for ##E'^2## looks okay. Divide both the numerator and denominator by ##c^4## and take the square root. You should be able to show the first equation above. Just make sure you keep track of the three ##\gamma##'s you have in this problem.
 
Last edited:
vela said:
For part (a), you should be able to show that
\begin{eqnarray*}
E' &= \gamma(E - \beta pc) \\
p'c &= \gamma(pc - \beta E)
\end{eqnarray*} where ##\beta = v/c## and ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##.

Your expression for ##E'^2## looks okay. Divide both the numerator and denominator by ##c^4## and take the square root. You should be able to show the first equation above. Just make sure you keep track of the three ##\gamma##'s you have in this problem.
Thanks very much for the help. It worked like a charm - the last part of the derivation that I ended up using was pretty neat. My only worry is that my prof will wonder how I thought to express ##E'## and ##cp'## in that way.
 
Look up the Lorentz transformation. :smile: You might already be familiar with it applied to x and t. It applies to all four-vectors.
 
vela said:
Look up the Lorentz transformation. :) You might already be familiar with it applied to x and t. It applies to all four-vectors.
Interesting - we've covered the Lorentz transformation, but not four-vectors. My class gives a brief overview of SR, but maybe I'll see it in future.

I have another question that I'm editing into the OP now - It's somewhat related, but I didn't want to flood the section with threads.

EDIT: Woops, guess it's been too long to edit. See you in the next thread XD
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K