Showing that general operator equations are hermitian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of general operators in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the conditions under which certain operators are Hermitian. The original poster presents two parts of a problem involving operator A and operator B, questioning the validity of their reasoning and the approach to the second part.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to demonstrate that the operator i(A-A+) is Hermitian and questions the validity of their approach to the second part involving the operator (A+B)^n. Some participants suggest reconsidering the need for multiplication and note that if A and B are Hermitian, then A+B is also Hermitian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing feedback on the first part of the problem while others express concerns about the mathematical formulation of the problems presented. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the original poster's reasoning, and multiple interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the original problem may lack clarity in its mathematical formulation, with suggestions that additional constraints or definitions may be necessary for a rigorous approach.

UCLphysics
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a)For a general operator A, show that and i(A-A+) are hermitian?

b) If operators A and B are hermitian, show that the operator (A+B)^n is Hermitian.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The first part I did,

(A+A+)+=(A++A)=(A+A+)

i(A-A+)=[i(A-A+)]+=(iA)+-(iA+)+)=i(A-A+)

The second part I used binomial expansion (induction) but I was told they do not commute so this cannot be done?

Is my answer to the first part correct and what route should I take for the second? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First part looks about right.

For the second part, do you really need to multiply things out? After all, if A and B are Hermitian then A+B is also Hermitian...
 
The problems seems to have no connection with <Advanced Physics> and neither with mathematics, since it's not mathematically (i.e. in agreement with mathematics) formulated and not even semantically.
 
For example, the mathematical problem for point a) should have been

"Let A be a densly defined linear operator on a complex separable Hilbert space [itex]\mathcal{H}[/itex].

Prove that if [itex]D(A)\cap D\left(A^{\dagger}\right)[/itex] is dense everywhere in [itex]\mathcal{H}[/itex],

then the operator [itex]i\left(A-A^{\dagger}\right)[/itex] is symmetric.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K