Showing there are no eigenvectors of the annhilation operator

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show there are no eigenvectors of [itex]a^{\dagger}[/itex] assuming the ground state |0> is the lowest energy state of the system.


Homework Equations


Coherent states of the SHO satisfy:
a|z> = z|z>


The Attempt at a Solution


Based on the hint that was given (assume there is such an eigenvector like the coherent state above and expand the state in the basis |n>) I tried this, but it seems too simple.

[itex]a^{\dagger}|0> = k|0>[/itex] (is this expansion in the |n> basis? or |0> basis?)

then conjugate transpose both sides

[itex]a<0|=\bar{k}<0|[/itex]

the lhs vanishes as a is acting on the ground state ket

Is this correct? Any help is greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Hakkinen!

You are not taking the conjugate transpose correctly - the left hand side should read [itex]\langle 0 \lvert a[/itex]. That is, it should look like a row vector multiplying a matrix. The operator [itex]a[/itex] "acts to the left" as a creation operator, not as an annihilation operator.
 
Oxvillian said:
Hello Hakkinen!

You are not taking the conjugate transpose correctly - the left hand side should read [itex]\langle 0 \lvert a[/itex]. That is, it should look like a row vector multiplying a matrix. The operator [itex]a[/itex] "acts to the left" as a creation operator, not as an annihilation operator.

Thanks for the reply! sorry for the simple mistakes

So is this not the correct approach to show this? If it is, should I start with [itex]a|0> = k|0>[/itex] and then conjugate, leaving the annihilation operator acting on the ground state bra?

so [itex]0 = <0|\bar{k}[/itex]

but this doesn't necessarily show there are no eigenvectors of the ann. operator does it?
 
Well [itex]a\lvert 0 \rangle = 0[/itex], since [itex]\lvert 0 \rangle[/itex] is the ground state. We need a new name for the hypothetical eigenstate of [itex]a^{\dagger}[/itex], let's just call it [itex]\lvert \psi \rangle[/itex]. Then

[itex]a^{\dagger}\lvert \psi \rangle = \lambda \lvert \psi \rangle,[/itex]

where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is some number (the eigenvalue). Try expanding [itex]\lvert \psi \rangle[/itex] in terms of the [itex]\lvert n \rangle[/itex] and see what you get.
 
Note that people usually call [itex]a[/itex] the annihilation operator, and [itex]a^\dagger[/itex] the creation operator. The reason it is worth to avoid confusion here, is that the annihilation operator [itex]a[/itex] (which satisfies [itex]a|0\rangle=0[/itex], where [itex]|0[/itex] is the ground state) actually has an eigenstate, while the creation operator does not.