Sigma Notation: Learn How to Evaluate Expressions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding and evaluating expressions in sigma notation, specifically focusing on how to express a series involving powers of 3 and the evaluation of summations of polynomial expressions. Participants seek clarification on the process of converting series into sigma notation and the application of summation formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to express the series 3^3 - 3^4 + 3^5 - ... - 3^100 in sigma notation and expresses a desire for a clear explanation of the process.
  • Another participant mentions the formula for the sum of the squares of the first n integers, \(\sum_{i=1}^n i^2 = n(n+1)/2\), and questions how to apply it.
  • A participant provides an example of distributing a summation over a polynomial expression and suggests that the course materials likely include formulas for basic summations.
  • There is a discussion about the lack of a mechanical procedure for deriving the sigma notation for the series involving powers of 3, with suggestions that trial and error may be necessary.
  • One participant points out that the formula provided for the sum of squares is incorrect and encourages looking for patterns in the series to express it in sigma notation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding sigma notation and its application. There is no consensus on the correct approach to expressing the series involving powers of 3, and multiple viewpoints on the evaluation of summations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific formulas for summations, but there is uncertainty about their application to the problems at hand. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the derivation of sigma notation for non-standard series.

missadorkable
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Express this in sigma notation?
3^3 - 3^4 + 3^5 - ... - 3^100

Evaluate these two sigmas?
n
∑ (i-2)^2
i =1

n
∑ (4-i^2)
i =1

I don't really understand sigma notation so I'm really interested in the process and explanation of how to do it. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did your course materials cover how to add up the squares of consecutive integers?
Do they give a formula for
[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n i^2[/tex]
 
yes.

n
∑ (i^2) = n(n+1)/2
i =1

How do I apply this? :S
 
For example

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n 3i^2 + 2i + 1[/tex]

The summation can be distributed to obtain

[tex]= 3 \sum_{i=1}^n i^2 + 2 \sum_{i=1}^n i + \sum_{i=1}^n 1[/tex]

[tex]= 3 ( n (n+1)/2) + 2 \sum_{i=1}^n i + n[/tex]

The materials probably give the the formula for [tex]\sum_{i=1}^n i[/tex] and you can use it also.

In the problems you asked about, you need to multiply out the expressions like [tex](i-2)^2[/tex] before you distribute the summation.
 
Alright, I think I understand what you're saying. What about the first question with expressing 3^3 - 3^4 + 3^5 - ... - 3^100 as sigma notation? Is there a formula that could be used to acquire the expression for the sigma notation?
 
missadorkable said:
Is there a formula that could be used to acquire the expression for the sigma notation?

No, there isn't a mechanical procedure for determining the formula (the function of i) that would be used in the sigma notation to get that series. You have to do it by trial and error. The terms alternate, so it could involve a negative number raised to a power. You can throw in a factor of [tex](-1)^i[/tex] or [tex](-1)^{i+1}[/tex] in the formula if it is needed to make the signs come out correctly. The things that are increasing by 1 in each term should tell you that the formula involves [tex]i[/tex] as an exponent. It looks like the first exponent starts as 3 not as 1. If your materials want you to start all summations with [tex]i = 1[/tex] then use the expression [tex]i+2[/tex] in the exponent to make the first term have an exponent of 3.
 
missadorkable said:
yes.

n
∑ (i^2) = n(n+1)/2
i =1

How do I apply this? :S

This is wrong. n(n+1)/2 is the sum of the first n integers.

To write the first in sigma notation, just look at the pattern. you've got a coefficient that is oscliating between -1 and 1, you have some odd numbers in the denominator. Just try to find a pattern.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K