B Sign conventions in torque and non-uniform circular motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net force on a pendulum bob as a function of the angle ##\theta## with the vertical. Two methods are presented: a straightforward approach using tension and weight, and a more complex one involving non-uniform circular motion and angular acceleration. The author grapples with defining angular speed and acceleration, particularly regarding the directionality of torque and its relationship to angular displacement. A key point raised is the relationship between the angles ##\phi## and ##\theta##, which indicates that their rates of change are inversely related. Ultimately, the author seeks clarification on the validity of their assumptions and calculations in both methods.
DrBanana
Messages
54
Reaction score
4
Sorry for the overly general title but my problem is regarding a specific problem: find the net force on the bob of a pendulum as a function of ##\theta##, the angle it makes with the vertical (assuming the observer is stationary with respect to point from which the string is hung and the vertical beam of the pendulum).

The easy way: If the maximum angular displacement is ##\theta_0##, then the tension for a general angle ##\theta## will be ##T=mg(3\cos\theta-2\cos\theta_0)##. This force points along the string, so we know its direction. The only other force is the weight. To solve the problem, we just take the resultant of these two forces.

The hard way: I'll abbreviate a 'Leap of faith' as LOF. The bob undergoes non-uniform circular motion (behold my epic drawing skills).
Screenshot_20240503_182132.png
It's position can be described with a vector ##r## such that ##r=|r|(\sin\theta \hat{i}-\cos\theta \hat{j})##. By definition, velocity is the derivative of the position: ##v=|r|\theta'(t)(\cos\theta \hat{i} +\sin\theta \hat{j})##. This is where I first run into problems. If I were measuring ##\theta## with its starting position on the positive x axis, I could just define ##\omega## (the angular speed) as the derivative of ##\theta## with respect to time. However, can I do that here? I must make a choice, and the particular choice I make here is that I let the displacement of the bob along the circular arc (starting from the x axis) take negative values for clockwise directions, so that the displacement ##s=|r|(\theta-\frac{\pi}{2})##. Then we can see that ##\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt}## (LOF number 1). If we differentiate the velocity vector again, we get ##a=-\omega^2r+ \alpha (\cos\theta \hat{i} + \sin\theta \hat{j})##, where ##a## is the acceleration vector and ##\alpha## is the angular acceleration, which, by definition, is the derivative of the angular speed. It just so happens that ##\theta '' (t) = \alpha##.

We know that ##\tau=I\alpha##, where ##\tau## is torque, ##I## is the moment of inertia and alpha is the angular acceleration. LOF number two: the angular acceleration formulated in the previous paragraph, is the same as this angular acceleration.

We also know that ##\tau = -mg|r|\sin\theta##. Then ##I\alpha=mgr \sin\theta## so ##\alpha=-\frac{g}{r}\theta## for small values of ##\theta##. LOF number 3 is, we can actually write this equation. This is perhaps my main point of confusion. For springs I can understand why the restoring force (and thus the acceleration) should have a sign opposite to the displacement, and for pendulums also I can sort of get a feel for why the torque needs to be 'opposite' in sign to the angular displacement, although not fully. For the spring example, the force vector and the displacement vector are in the same plane, so there is a meaning of the word opposite. However torque as a vector extends out from the page, and there is no vector quantity on the right hand side of the equation that does that. I thought that with these mechanics problems you can either write equations of vectors, or of their magnitudes (no directions), but not something in between.

Anyway, assuming I could write that, it would be possible to solve the differential equation and find the ##\omega^2## term (we would need to specify the maximum angular displacement as well) in terms of ##\theta##. After that we could plug in any value of theta in the net acceleration equation and find the corresponding force.

Using both methods, I find that the results are approximately equal. Are all of the leaps of faith I took luck, or did those work, and if so, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DrBanana said:
If I were measuring ##\theta## with its starting position on the positive x axis, I could just define ##\omega## (the angular speed) as the derivative of ##\theta## with respect to time. However, can I do that here?
Why not? Let ##\phi## be the angle w.r.t. the positive x-axis increasing clockwise and ##\theta## be as shown in your drawing. Then
##\phi+\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}\implies \dot{\phi}+\dot{\theta}=0.##
This says that one increases at the same rate as the other one decreases.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top