Signal strength of a wave packet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the signal strength of a wave packet defined by contributions from various frequencies. The signal strength as a function of time, V(t), is derived using the integral of the wave packet's frequency contributions, resulting in a specific expression involving sine functions. Participants discuss the sketches of g(ω) and V(t), clarifying the limits of integration and addressing uncertainties about the definitions of Δω and Δt in the context of the plots. The standard deviation approach is suggested for calculating Δt, while confirming the correct limits for the integral is emphasized. Overall, the conversation centers on accurately representing the mathematical relationships and properties of wave packets.
Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Assume a wave packet is has contributions from various frequencies, give by g(ω)=C for |ω|<ω0, and g(ω) =0 for elsewhere.

a)What is the signal strength as a function of time, i.e., V(t)=?

b) Sketch g(ω) and V(t); You can use fooplots.com, for example, or python.

c) Indicate Δω and Δt in the above plots; Does the products of these two satisfy ΔωΔt>1/2?

Homework Equations


V(t) = 1/√(2π) * integral from -∞ to +∞ of [ g(ω)*exp(iωt)] dω

exp(iωt) = cos(ωt) + isin(ωt)

The Attempt at a Solution



a.) V(t) = 1/√(2π) * integral from -ω0 to +ω0 of [ C*exp(iωt)] dω

using eulers formula and the properties of even and odd functions

V(t) = 2/√(2π) * integral from 0 to +ω0 of [ C*cos(ωt)] dω

V(t) = 2C/√(2π) * sin(ω0t)/t = √(2/π)*ω0C * sin(ω0t)/ω0t

b.) the sketches for g(ω) and V(t) are in the attachments

c.) I am not really sure what Δω and Δt in these graphs
 

Attachments

  • phy graph.jpg
    phy graph.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 500
  • phy graph 2.jpg
    phy graph 2.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 490
  • signal strength vs time.png
    signal strength vs time.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 588
Physics news on Phys.org
Elvis 123456789 said:
V(t) = 2/√(2π) * integral from 0 to +ω0 of [ C*cos(ωt)] dω
Shouldn't the lower integral limit be ##-\omega_0##?
Elvis 123456789 said:
c.) I am not really sure what Δω and Δt in these graphs
Use the definition of standard deviation. For example for V(t), you will use
$$
\Delta t = \sqrt{E[t^2]-(E[t])^2}
$$
where ##E[\,\,]## means taking average over the intensity ##|V(t)|^2##. Similar arguments for ##g(\omega)##.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Shouldn't the lower integral limit be −ω0−ω0-\omega_0?
I have a factor of 2 in the front to account for that. Is that not right?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
I have a factor of 2 in the front to account for that. Is that not right?
Ah sorry I missed that, you are right.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top