Silly Question about systems of equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the intersection of the equations y=x and y=x^2+1, with the original poster questioning whether there is an abstract way to determine that these two curves do not intersect. The subject area involves systems of equations and their graphical interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the functions involved and discuss the implications of their behavior, particularly focusing on the increasing nature of the function derived from the equations. There is also a consideration of the general methods for determining the existence of zeros in functions.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various perspectives on the lack of a general method for determining zeros of functions, with some participants providing insights into specific cases and the implications of function continuity. There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions under which functions may or may not intersect.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of evaluating functions at specific points and the uncertainty involved in determining intersections without a general method. The original poster expresses a desire for a more abstract understanding rather than a numerical solution.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I had a thought while doing some calculus last night and it now concerns me that for some reason I cannot answer it. If given the equations [tex]y=x[/tex] and [tex]y=x^2+1[/tex] it would appear that since the range of the latter "reaches" infinity "first" that these two curves never meet. Now that thought did not occur to me until I sketched them after I tried solving them as a system of equations.

Is there some way (not intuitively, but abstractly) to see that these two curves never intersect?

Thanks,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These two equations specifically, sure. x2+1=x obviously has no solutions in the reals.

Any system of equations, obviously not. There is no general solution for finding the zeros of a quintic, let alone any arbitrary function.
 
I am not interested in finding any zeros; I am interested in knowing if there is a way to determine that there are not any zeros.

Casey
 
Look at f(x)= x2+1- x. f'(x)= 2x- 1 which is positive for x> 1/2 so it is always increasing. When x= 1/2, that has a value of 1/4+ 1- 1/2= 3/4. As long as there is no zero between 0 and 1/2, the function cannot have a zero and so the equation
x2+ 1= x cannot have a solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is no general method to determine whether some function [itex]f(x)[/itex] has any zeroes. Suppose you evaluate the function at two points, [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. If the function value is positive at both points (or negative at both points), there might well be no points or two points or four points (or ...) between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] where the function is zero. (Note: In saying this I am counting double zeros such as x2=0 as two zeros). You don't know which is the case and there is no general way of knowing.

Suppose you get lucky and find that [itex]f(x_1)[/itex] and [itex]f(x_2)[/itex] have opposite signs. You still don't know that the function passes through zero between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. Consider [itex]f(x)=1/x[/itex] for example. [itex]f(-2)=-1/2[/itex] and [itex]f(1)=1[/itex], but the function does not pass through zero between -2 and 1. In the special case tht [itex]f(x)[/tex] is continuous and exists everywhere between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] then finding points with opposite signs does guarantee that the function is zero at at least one point between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex].[/itex]
 
D H said:
There is no general method to determine whether some function [itex]f(x)[/itex] has any zeroes. Suppose you evaluate the function at two points, [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. If the function value is positive at both points (or negative at both points), there might well be no points or two points or four points (or ...) between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] where the function is zero. (Note: In saying this I am counting double zeros such as x2=0 as two zeros). You don't know which is the case and there is no general way of knowing.

Suppose you get lucky and find that [itex]f(x_1)[/itex] and [itex]f(x_2)[/itex] have opposite signs. You still don't know that the function passes through zero between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex]. Consider [itex]f(x)=1/x[/itex] for example. [itex]f(-2)=-1/2[/itex] and [itex]f(1)=1[/itex], but the function does not pass through zero between -2 and 1. In the special case tht [itex]f(x)[/tex] is continuous and exists everywhere between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex] then finding points with opposite signs does guarantee that the function is zero at at least one point between [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_2[/itex].[/itex]
[itex] <br /> Gotcha. Thanks for explaining D H.<br /> <br /> Casey[/itex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K